pytorch - 💡(How to fix) Fix Accelerator-independent API to determine if a specific backend is available? [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
pytorch/pytorch#180343Fetched 2026-04-16 06:35:13
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
54
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
subscribed ×24mentioned ×23labeled ×6commented ×1

Code Example

if torch.cuda.is_available():
    do_some_cuda_stuff_bro()

---

if torch.my_backend.is_available():
    configure_my_backend()

---

if hasattr(torch, "my_backend") and torch.my_backend.is_available():
    configure_my_backend()

---

def is_available(backend: str) -> bool:
  module = getattr(torch, backend, None)
  return module is not None and module.is_available()
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch

The most common pattern I've seen to determine whether you have, say, cuda available, is to do something like this:

if torch.cuda.is_available():
    do_some_cuda_stuff_bro()

This lets you write code that runs equivalently on CUDA and CPU code with customizations for the CUDA portion. If you have an out-of-tree backend, though, the backend itself will not be available, so if you want to write something equivalent like:

if torch.my_backend.is_available():
    configure_my_backend()

You'll get an AttributeError rather than graceful degradation, so instead you have to do something like this:

if hasattr(torch, "my_backend") and torch.my_backend.is_available():
    configure_my_backend()

Which is a bit unwieldy. I suspect that many people writing backend-independent code will want a single easy check for "is the backend present" and "is the accelerator available", so it would be nice if there were an official, standard way to do this check.

A possible interface for this could be a generic torch.is_available like this:

def is_available(backend: str) -> bool:
  module = getattr(torch, backend, None)
  return module is not None and module.is_available()

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

cc @bdhirsh @NmomoN @mengpenghui @fwenguang @cdzhan @1274085042 @PHLens @albanD @guangyey @EikanWang

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a generic is_available function to check for the presence and availability of a backend.

Guidance

  • Define a function like torch.is_available that takes a backend name as input and checks if the corresponding module exists and its is_available method returns True.
  • Use getattr to safely retrieve the module and avoid AttributeError.
  • Return False if the module does not exist or its is_available method returns False.
  • Consider adding this function to a utility module for easy reuse.

Example

def is_available(backend: str) -> bool:
  module = getattr(torch, backend, None)
  return module is not None and hasattr(module, 'is_available') and module.is_available()

Notes

This solution assumes that all backends have an is_available method. If this is not the case, additional error handling may be necessary.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Implement the proposed is_available function to provide a standard way to check for backend presence and availability.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING