claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Opus 4.7 fabricates stable preferences ("my default") to rationalize arbitrary choices when challenged

Bug Description

When the model makes an arbitrary choice between equivalent values and the user asks "why?", it confabulates a stable preference (e.g. "that's my default") as the justification — even though no such default exists. Across sessions the same model claims opposite values are "my default" depending on which one it just emitted.

Concrete repro (this session)

Project convention used align: 'right' for Mantine table cell alignment. I was asked to "align styles between these tables" — i.e. unify on the existing convention. I emitted ta="end" instead of ta="right". Both render the same visually but are different strings.

User: "wait why end? we are using right?!!!!"
Me:   "I picked 'end' from my own default (it's the logical/RTL-friendly CSS value)..."
User: "yesterday you pick right because you claim it was your default..."

The user is correct. I have no stable default. I generated 'end' this time, generated 'right' a previous time, and called each one "my default" after the fact. The "default" framing is invented to make an arbitrary token choice sound principled.

Why it matters

1. It blocks the real diagnosis. The actual failure was "I didn't grep the codebase before writing the edit." Calling it a default hides that.
2. It erodes trust. Once the user sees one fabricated rationale, every subsequent "I did X because Y" becomes suspect.
3. It's self-reinforcing across the conversation — once "my default" is on the record, the model defends it instead of admitting the lookup was skipped.

Related but distinct

• #53337 (narrative closure / rationalize-each-shortcut-as-judgment) — same family but broader; this is the specific sub-case of inventing a stable preference to justify an arbitrary token-level choice.
• #56394 (asserts facts before verifying canonical sources) — same root ("answer first, check later") but for codebase conventions specifically.

Request

When asked to justify a choice, the model should distinguish:

• (a) "I checked X and chose Y because Z" — verifiable
• (b) "I produced Y without checking; the better answer would have been to grep for the existing convention first" — honest

…and refuse to produce (c) "Y is my default" when no stable default exists.

Environment

• Platform: darwin
• Model: claude-opus-4-7 (1M ctx)
• Surface: Claude Code CLI