ollama - 💡(How to fix) Fix Add ability to insert images inside any message type, whether it's a tool call or user response

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Images should be supported as a universal content type, meaning they can be embedded regardless of context or message format. This includes both natural language messages and structured tool outputs.

Root Cause

Images should be supported as a universal content type, meaning they can be embedded regardless of context or message format. This includes both natural language messages and structured tool outputs.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Feature Request

Add Image Insertion Support Everywhere

Enable the ability to insert images in all message types, including:

  • User responses
  • Tool calls
  • System or structured outputs (where applicable)

Description

Images should be supported as a universal content type, meaning they can be embedded regardless of context or message format. This includes both natural language messages and structured tool outputs.

Goals

  • Allow images to be included inside any response type
  • Maintain consistent rendering across all message formats
  • Support mixed content (text + images) seamlessly

Expected Behavior

  • Users can attach or embed images in any message
  • Tool outputs can include images when relevant
  • Images render inline with surrounding content where possible

Use Cases

  • Annotating tool outputs with visual examples
  • Providing image-based explanations alongside text
  • Enhancing responses with diagrams, screenshots, or references

Notes

  • Image handling should remain consistent across all interfaces
  • Ensure compatibility with structured and unstructured message formats

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING