codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Add an option to hide tool call traces in raw output mode

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Code Example

[output]
   raw_show_tools = false
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What variant of Codex are you using?

CLI

What feature would you like to see?

Description

When using Codex in raw output mode, the output currently includes the full tool call chain / tool invocation traces along with the codex actual response.

This is useful for debugging, but it makes raw mode inconvenient for one of its main practical uses: copying the codex output final answer cleanly.

For example, I often use raw mode for sessions with many short translation requests. Later, when I want to copy one specific earlier translation, the transcript is cluttered with tool calls and command output between assistant messages. This makes it much harder to scroll back, find the exact answer, and copy it cleanly.

Request

Please add an option to control whether tool call traces are included in raw mode output.

Possible designs:

  1. Add a config option:
    [output]
    raw_show_tools = false

Expected behavior

When tool traces are disabled, raw mode should print only the assistant-visible response content, without command invocations, tool results, or internal execution traces.

This would make raw mode much easier to use for copying clean answers, while still preserving the current verbose behavior for users who rely on it for debugging or auditing.

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING