langchain - 💡(How to fix) Fix Add langchain-torchagentic partner package - differentiable planning tool [1 pull requests]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Fix Action

Fixed

Code Example

from langchain_torchagentic import TorchAgenticPlannerTool

tool = TorchAgenticPlannerTool(
    num_states=64,
    num_actions=8,
    planner_type="vi",  # or "mcts"
)

result = tool.invoke({"task": "Find optimal route from A to B"})
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Submission checklist

  • This is a feature request, not a bug report or usage question.
  • I added a clear and descriptive title that summarizes the feature request.
  • I used the GitHub search to find a similar feature request and didn't find it.
  • I checked the LangChain documentation and API reference to see if this feature already exists.
  • This is not related to the langchain-community package.

Package (Required)

  • langchain
  • langchain-openai
  • langchain-anthropic
  • langchain-classic
  • langchain-core
  • langchain-model-profiles
  • langchain-tests
  • langchain-text-splitters
  • langchain-chroma
  • langchain-deepseek
  • langchain-exa
  • langchain-fireworks
  • langchain-groq
  • langchain-huggingface
  • langchain-mistralai
  • langchain-nomic
  • langchain-ollama
  • langchain-openrouter
  • langchain-perplexity
  • langchain-qdrant
  • langchain-xai
  • Other / not sure / general

Feature Description

I'd like to propose adding a new partner package called langchain-torchagentic — it wraps torchagentic's differentiable planning primitives (Value Iteration, MCTS) as a standard LangChain BaseTool.

The idea is to let LLM agents call differentiable planners the same way they'd call a calculator or a search tool — just another tool in the toolbox, but for planning action sequences. torchagentic gives you PyTorch-native planning: value iteration, Monte Carlo tree search, successor representation, all differentiable and composable.

I've already set this up following the same structure as the other partner packages in libs/partners/ (exa, xai, perplexity, etc.). The PR is at #37795 with tests passing, so it's ready for review — just needs a maintainer to take a look and assign the issue so the bot unblocks it.

Use Case

I'm building agents that need to plan sequences of actions using learned reward models — things like navigation, resource allocation, or game-playing. Right now there's no built-in way to do differentiable planning as a LangChain tool. You either roll your own planner or call an external solver, which breaks the seamless agent experience.

With langchain-torchagentic, you'd just register the tool and the agent can invoke planning as a natural step in its reasoning loop. The package already lives at libs/partners/torchagentic/ with tests passing — it's really just waiting for a maintainer to give it the green light.

Proposed Solution

A partner package at libs/partners/torchagentic/ exposing a TorchAgenticPlannerTool (subclass of BaseTool) that runs value iteration or MCTS on reward/transition models and returns a summary of the planned states/actions.

Usage would look like:

from langchain_torchagentic import TorchAgenticPlannerTool

tool = TorchAgenticPlannerTool(
    num_states=64,
    num_actions=8,
    planner_type="vi",  # or "mcts"
)

result = tool.invoke({"task": "Find optimal route from A to B"})

The implementation is already done in PR #37795 — just needs a reviewer.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Additional Context

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING