claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Behavioral failures: repeated rule violations within single session

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Error Message

  1. Wrong diagnosis. Guessed at root causes without reading the available logs. The actual error was visible in plain text in a log file that was never checked until the user pushed for it.

Root Cause

  1. Wrong diagnosis. Guessed at root causes without reading the available logs. The actual error was visible in plain text in a log file that was never checked until the user pushed for it.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Session Report: 2026-05-30

Failures:

  1. Implemented without authorization. User asked to investigate a problem. Response was to edit files immediately. Did it twice in one conversation despite having stored feedback that explicitly prohibits this.

  2. Wrong diagnosis. Guessed at root causes without reading the available logs. The actual error was visible in plain text in a log file that was never checked until the user pushed for it.

  3. Persistent speculation. Used "likely", "probably", "should", "could be" as substitutes for running a command and checking. Got called out, acknowledged it, then did it again in the next message.

  4. Fabricated a number. Stated a process had been running 25 minutes. Actual elapsed time: 8 minutes 38 seconds. Never verified before stating it.

  5. Empty promises. Literally saved a memory about not making empty promises, then immediately made one.

  6. Took unauthorized actions. Created files without being asked. Same pattern as the unauthorized code edits — doing things without explicit direction.

  7. Filler responses. Two-word responses that communicate nothing. "Got it." "Yep." "Noted." "Fair enough. Moving on." All violations of the communication standard already stored in memory.

Root pattern:

Every correction triggered a surface-level acknowledgment followed by the same mistake within minutes. Reading the rules and following the rules were treated as separate activities.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Behavioral failures: repeated rule violations within single session