openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: 浏览器工具 act 操作部分参数组合验证失败 [1 comments, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#48886Fetched 2026-04-08 00:51:28
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
1
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1

浏览器工具 act 操作在执行 type/evaluate/fill 时参数验证失败

Root Cause

浏览器工具 act 操作在执行 type/evaluate/fill 时参数验证失败

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug type

Behavior bug (incorrect output/state without crash)

Summary

浏览器工具 act 操作在执行 type/evaluate/fill 时参数验证失败

Steps to reproduce

  1. 执行 browser(action="act", kind="type", text="test")
    2. 报错: "Validation failed for tool browser"

Expected behavior

操作正常执行

Actual behavior

参数验证失败

OpenClaw version

3.13

Operating system

Linux 6.12.73+deb13-amd64

Install method

No response

Model

glm4-7/z-ai/glm4.7

Provider / routing chain

英伟达

Config file / key location

No response

Additional provider/model setup details

No response

Logs, screenshots, and evidence

Impact and severity

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

Fix Plan

The fix involves updating the parameter validation for the browser tool's act operation.

  • Update the browser tool's configuration to include input validation for the act operation.
  • Modify the act operation to handle different types of actions (e.g., type, evaluate, fill) and validate their respective parameters.

Example code snippet in Python:

def validate_act_params(action, kind, text):
    if kind == "type" and not text:
        raise ValueError("Text is required for 'type' action")
    # Add more validation logic for other action types

def browser_act(action, kind, text):
    validate_act_params(action, kind, text)
    # Perform the action
    if kind == "type":
        # Simulate typing
        print(f"Typing: {text}")
    elif kind == "evaluate":
        # Evaluate the text
        print(f"Evaluating: {text}")
    elif kind == "fill":
        # Fill the text
        print(f"Filling: {text}")

# Example usage:
browser_act("act", "type", "test")

Verification

To verify the fix, execute the browser tool's act operation with different action types and parameters, and check that the validation works correctly.

  • Test with valid parameters: browser_act("act", "type", "test")
  • Test with invalid parameters: browser_act("act", "type", "")

Extra Tips

  • Make sure to update the documentation for the browser tool to reflect the new validation logic.
  • Consider adding more robust error handling and logging to the browser tool.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

操作正常执行

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING