claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Anthropic API Error: Server Rate Limiting Interrupts Workflow Execution [1 participants]

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/samm/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.119 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at mH6 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2736:2177)\n at E$8 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2736:1257)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T00:04:05.859Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdpkvYpWiaDfKvveENS"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:05.282Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdprHksMXUA4KKAdMWb"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:06.753Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdpzi2A9rA7cP9QDsjg"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:08.661Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdrHpCTyUdMyLUoogmh"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:27.941Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdrVEHnpShSV3vnPbs3"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:28.764Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdrYRmzyh2xZscagnSe"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:29.534Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdreiJJ3DjAASAHzXPZ"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:31.056Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdrzL1J1MvYXm2Kw9Vt"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:35.712Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdsUqFnQcsZqX3g8yQp"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:42.174Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"Rate limited"},"request_id":"req_011CaPdsb3ow4DDqJDSMYKPj"}\n at generate (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:55343)\n at makeRequest (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-25T01:39:43.867Z"}]

TL;DR

The issue is likely due to the server temporarily limiting requests, and a workaround could be to implement a retry mechanism with exponential backoff to handle the rate limit errors.

Guidance

• The errors indicate a rate limit error with a 429 status code, suggesting that the server is limiting requests.
• To mitigate this, consider implementing a retry mechanism that waits for a certain amount of time before retrying the request.
• The wait time can be increased exponentially after each retry to avoid overwhelming the server.
• It may also be helpful to review the request frequency and adjust it to be within the allowed limits.

Example

function makeRequestWithRetry(request) {
  const maxRetries = 5;
  const initialWaitTime = 1000; // 1 second
  let retries = 0;
  let waitTime = initialWaitTime;

  while (retries < maxRetries) {
    try {
      return makeRequest(request);
    } catch (error) {
      if (error.status === 429) {
        retries++;
        waitTime *= 2; // exponential backoff
        await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, waitTime));
      } else {
        throw error;
      }
    }
  }
  throw new Error(`Failed after ${maxRetries} retries`);
}

Notes

The provided code snippet is a basic example and may need to be adapted to the specific use case. Additionally, it's essential to review the request frequency and adjust it to be within the allowed limits to avoid hitting the rate limit in the first place.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff to handle the rate limit errors, as the issue seems to be related to the server's temporary request limit.