claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] auth failure shouldn't burn a credit. session ID from earlier (session_01Rr3qaPW5KccdYCnNww2zXM) [3 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#49695Fetched 2026-04-17 08:34:01
View on GitHub
Comments
3
Participants
2
Timeline
8
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
commented ×3closed ×1cross-referenced ×1labeled ×1

Error Message

Error Messages/Logs

Code Example

Something went wrong
Authentication failed while accessing the git_repository source. Check that your GitHub token or credentials have read access to this repository. If using a private repo, verify the integration is authorized for it.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

ultrareview token burned due to auth failue

What Should Happen?

token should not have been burned

Error Messages/Logs

Something went wrong
Authentication failed while accessing the git_repository source. Check that your GitHub token or credentials have read access to this repository. If using a private repo, verify the integration is authorized for it.

Steps to Reproduce

run ultrareview with auth not configured in org of repo. auth was configured for account

Claude Model

None

Is this a regression?

No, this never worked

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.1.112

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

iTerm2

Additional Information

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Configure authentication for the organization of the repository to prevent token burn due to authentication failure.

Guidance

  • Verify that the GitHub token or credentials have read access to the repository, especially if it's a private repository.
  • Check the integration authorization for the private repository, ensuring it's configured correctly for the organization.
  • Review the authentication configuration for the organization of the repository, as it seems to be different from the account-level configuration.
  • Test ultrareview with the corrected authentication configuration to see if the issue is resolved.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not require a code-level fix, but rather a configuration adjustment.

Notes

The issue seems to be related to a misconfiguration of authentication settings between the account and organization levels. Ensuring consistency in these settings should resolve the problem. However, without more details on the specific authentication setup, the guidance provided is based on the error message and steps to reproduce.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Configure the authentication for the organization of the repository to match the requirements, as the current setup is causing the authentication failure and subsequent token burn.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] auth failure shouldn't burn a credit. session ID from earlier (session_01Rr3qaPW5KccdYCnNww2zXM) [3 comments, 2 participants]