Issue Station
Sign In
Tools hereToolbox

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] [BUG] /ultrareview returns "failed" on tracking page despite "completed" status in CLI [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#55148•Fetched 2026-05-01 05:45:01
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
SmartCent-devSmartCent-dev
Participants
github-actions[bot]github-actions[bot]SmartCent-devSmartCent-dev
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4commented ×1

Error Message

Error Messages/Logs

No error message shown in CLI. Tracking URL

Code Example

No error message shown in CLI. Tracking URL
  confirmed failure. Session ID:
  session_01VvMgMUuGk95NUdN3UcZj4R
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

/ultrareview launched successfully, CLI showed completed status with empty findings [], but the tracking URL showed the review as failed. No review results were produced.

What Should Happen?

Review should complete successfully and return
findings (or explicitly return "no issues found").
If it fails, CLI status should reflect failed — not completed.

Error Messages/Logs

No error message shown in CLI. Tracking URL
  confirmed failure. Session ID:
  session_01VvMgMUuGk95NUdN3UcZj4R

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Run /ultrareview in a git repo with local
    uncommitted changes
  2. CLI output shows: Free ultrareview 1 of 3.
    Ultrareview launched... Track: https://claude.ai/cod e/session_01VvMgMUuGk95NUdN3UcZj4R
  3. Task notification arrives with status: completed and findings []
  4. Visit tracking URL — status shows failed

Claude Model

Sonnet (default)

Is this a regression?

I don't know

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.1.123 (Claude Code)

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

Windows

Terminal/Shell

WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux)

Additional Information

Additional Information: Scope reported at launch: 3 files changed, 10517
insertions(+), 10517 deletions(-). This was a free
use (1 of 3). Requesting credit be restored since
the review failed to complete.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue can be mitigated by retrying the /ultrareview command with the same parameters to see if the failure was transient.

Guidance

  • Verify that the issue is not specific to the Sonnet model by trying the review with a different model, if available.
  • Check the Anthropic API status for any known issues that might be causing the review to fail.
  • Inspect the request payload and parameters sent to the Anthropic API to ensure they are correctly formatted and valid.
  • Consider reaching out to the Anthropic API support team with the provided Session ID (session_01VvMgMUuGk95NUdN3UcZj4R) for further investigation.

Notes

The provided information does not include error messages or logs from the Anthropic API, which could be crucial in diagnosing the issue. The fact that the CLI shows a completed status but the tracking URL shows a failed review suggests a potential discrepancy in status reporting.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Retry the /ultrareview command to see if the issue was transient, as there is no clear indication of a version-specific bug that would necessitate an upgrade.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…
#api#memory optimization#batch processing#GPU compatibility#latency issue

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING