claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] [CC Desktop] Sticky user-prompt overlay collapses readable area when scrolling long responses [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#58748Fetched 2026-05-14 03:40:30
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4commented ×1

Error Message

Error Messages/Logs

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Impact For sessions with multi-repo workspaces and substantive prompts (the normal case for any real engineering task), the response area becomes unusable mid-scroll. Workaround so far: shrink the window or close all but one repo's PR plate, neither of which is acceptable for normal work.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Environment

  • CC Desktop version: <fill from Claude Code → About>
  • macOS: <fill from About This Mac>
  • Conversation has 2+ Git repos active (PR-status plates visible at bottom)

Actual behavior At a certain scroll position, the user-prompt block becomes effectively sticky and visually overlaps Claude's response. With Git PR-status plates pinned at the bottom (showing Create PR for each repo), the readable area between them collapses to a narrow strip — sometimes only 1–2 lines tall. The response is unreadable without resizing the window or hiding the PR plates.

The effect is proportional to:

  • Length of the user prompt (longer prompt → larger overlay)
  • Number of Git repos in the working tree (more PR plates → less bottom space)
  • Window height (smaller window → faster collapse)

Impact For sessions with multi-repo workspaces and substantive prompts (the normal case for any real engineering task), the response area becomes unusable mid-scroll. Workaround so far: shrink the window or close all but one repo's PR plate, neither of which is acceptable for normal work.

Screenshot [attach the two-session screenshot — left: Kleos session, right: AI Skills Conf Workshop session, both showing the prompt overlay covering most of the response]

Suggested fixes

  1. Make the user-prompt block scroll with the content rather than become sticky on certain scroll positions, OR
  2. Add a collapse/expand toggle on the user-prompt block (one click to dismiss the overlay while reading), OR
  3. Limit the user-prompt block's max-height when sticky (e.g. 3 lines + ellipsis with hover to expand).

What Should Happen?

Expected behavior While scrolling, the user message scrolls off the top (or collapses to a small reference) so the response area uses the available height. PR-status plates at bottom stay compact.

Error Messages/Logs

Steps to Reproduce

Steps to reproduce

  1. In CC Desktop, submit a long user prompt (multi-paragraph, ~500+ chars).
  2. Wait for Claude to produce a long response (~10+ paragraphs).
  3. Scroll down through Claude's response.

Claude Model

Opus

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.1.23 (Claude Code)

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

Terminal.app (macOS)

Additional Information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING