claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Claude 4.7 refuses authorized security tooling work that 4.6 handles [1 comments, 1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#50829Fetched 2026-04-20 12:11:54
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
1
Timeline
9
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4closed ×1commented ×1cross-referenced ×1

Error Message

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/<user>/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.114 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at sd_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:2177)\n at WH8 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:1257)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T17:27:39.317Z"}]

Code Example

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/<user>/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.114 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at sd_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:2177)\n    at WH8 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T17:27:39.317Z"}]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description Since the release of 4.7, ive had issues where the guardrails appear to be raised for code I have been working on with 4.6. Some of this involves EDR bypasses, shellcode, c2 implants etc. As part of the Cyber Verification Program with my team account, this shouldnt be a problem. You can see within this session that 4.7 assumes my codebase breaks its usage policy, where 4.6 is willing to continue its development with me. Would it be possible to look in to this for me and let me know if this is a bug or simply 4.7 not retaining memory from built up conversations

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: WarpTerminal
  • Version: 2.1.114
  • Feedback ID: ba02ea9e-045f-4379-9528-bab5dc511f13

Errors

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/<user>/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.114 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at sd_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:2177)\n    at WH8 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2751:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T17:27:39.317Z"}]

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue may be related to changes in the guardrails policy between versions 4.6 and 4.7, causing the codebase to be flagged as non-compliant.

Guidance

  • Review the usage policy changes between versions 4.6 and 4.7 to understand what specific changes may be causing the issue.
  • Verify that the Cyber Verification Program settings are correctly configured for the team account and that the codebase is properly exempt from the guardrails policy.
  • Investigate the error message "Lock acquisition failed" and its relation to the multi-process scenarios, as it may be a separate issue affecting the overall functionality.
  • Check if there are any known issues or updates related to the WarpTerminal version 2.1.114 that may be contributing to the problem.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient information to create a relevant example.

Notes

The issue seems to be specific to the interaction between the codebase, the Cyber Verification Program, and the guardrails policy changes in version 4.7. Without more information about the specific code and settings involved, it's challenging to provide a definitive solution.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Given the uncertainty around the cause, it may be necessary to temporarily adjust the guardrails policy or settings to allow continued development while the issue is investigated further.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Claude 4.7 refuses authorized security tooling work that 4.6 handles [1 comments, 1 participants]