claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] CLI Leader Component Non-Functional [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#49681Fetched 2026-04-17 08:34:19
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×1cross-referenced ×1

Error Message

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/nagawa/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.112 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at Od_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:2177)\n at Ke6 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:1257)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-17T03:10:10.528Z"}]

Code Example

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/nagawa/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.112 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at Od_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:2177)\n    at Ke6 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-17T03:10:10.528Z"}]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description Leader completely broke

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: tmux
  • Version: 2.1.112
  • Feedback ID: 0d816da0-3038-48c1-8ee3-50c43c000f36

Errors

[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/nagawa/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.112 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n    at Od_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:2177)\n    at Ke6 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2748:1257)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-17T03:10:10.528Z"}]
<img width="1454" height="798" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6205a130-1d92-4a93-a085-e75ed5511215" />

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue might be related to a lock acquisition failure, and checking the file system permissions or lock files in the /Users/nagawa/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.112 directory could provide more insight.

Guidance

  • Investigate the file system permissions for the directory /Users/nagawa/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.112 to ensure the process has the necessary access rights.
  • Check for any lock files in the mentioned directory that might be causing the acquisition failure, and consider removing them if they are not necessary.
  • Review the error message which suggests this error is expected in multi-process scenarios, implying the issue might be related to how the application handles concurrent access.
  • Consider providing more details about the application's usage and configuration to better understand the context of the error.

Notes

The provided error message indicates a non-fatal error, which might not be the direct cause of the "Leader completely broke" issue, but it's a starting point for investigation.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Given the information, it seems prudent to first investigate and potentially remove any unnecessary lock files or adjust file system permissions before considering other actions, as this directly addresses the error message provided.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] CLI Leader Component Non-Functional [1 comments, 2 participants]