openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: Discord routing / mention-gating issue in OpenClaw [3 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#44502Fetched 2026-04-08 00:46:02
View on GitHub
Comments
3
Participants
3
Timeline
7
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
commented ×3labeled ×2subscribed ×2

I found a Discord preflight / mention-gating bug where message handling is too permissive in some agent-routing cases.

The issue is not just “mention required vs not required”. The preflight logic can still treat the wrong content as attention for the current agent, especially when:

  • another configured agent is being addressed
  • a role mention is present
  • an agent/role mention appears later in quoted text
  • a configured agent bot is the sender in a mention-only channel
  • a home-channel message names a different configured agent

This leads to incorrect routing / reply decisions in Discord.

Observed Problem

Discord message preflight should be strict about who is being addressed right now.

Instead, the current behavior can allow messages through when they should be dropped because:

  • the message is really targeting another configured agent
  • the message contains another role mention, not the current agent
  • the apparent “mention” is only present later in quoted/copied text
  • the sender is another configured agent bot in a mention-gated channel
  • a plain-text delegation like “get Codey to help” is allowed in the current agent’s home channel instead of being ignored/rerouted

Expected Behavior

Discord preflight should:

  • only treat the current agent as mentioned when the attention signal is clearly for that agent
  • ignore later quoted mentions / pasted examples
  • drop messages that explicitly target another configured agent
  • drop unrelated role mentions
  • avoid cross-agent bot-trigger loops in mention-only channels
  • avoid broad “search the whole message” behavior for mention detection

Root Cause

The preflight mention logic needs tighter attention scoping and stricter handling of other-agent / role mentions.

The local fix did three main things:

1. Limit mention detection to the attention window

Instead of treating the whole message body as equally relevant, the fix derives a short attention window:

  • normalize newlines
  • take the first paragraph
  • collapse whitespace
  • truncate to 240 chars

This prevents a quoted command/example later in the message from being treated as an active mention.

Local constant added:

  • DISCORD_MENTION_ATTENTION_WINDOW_CHARS = 240

Helper added:

  • extractDiscordMentionAttentionText(text)

2. Detect when another configured Discord agent is being addressed

The fix enumerates configured Discord-bound agents from bindings and checks whether the message is actually naming / mentioning another configured agent.

Helpers added:

  • hasAgentSpecificMentionConfig(...)
  • isConfiguredDiscordAgentSender(...)
  • resolveOtherMentionedDiscordAgents(...)

This allows preflight to drop messages when:

  • another configured agent is explicitly mentioned
  • another configured agent is delegated to by name in plain text
  • another configured agent bot is the sender in a mention-only channel

3. Treat role mentions more carefully

Role mentions were tightened so that:

  • a role mention only counts if it appears in the attention window
  • role labels can match agent names where appropriate
  • unrelated role mentions cause the message to be dropped
  • quoted role mentions later in the message do not count as a current mention

Helpers added:

  • matchesRoleLabelInText(...)
  • resolveMentionedRoleAttention(...)

Local Implementation Details

File changed

src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.ts

Main behavior changes

  • added a 240-char attention window for mention detection
  • built “current-agent mention text” from:
    • short attention text
    • role labels found in the attention window
  • resolved “other mentioned agents” from configured Discord bindings
  • dropped guild messages when:
    • another configured agent is mentioned
    • another role is mentioned and it is not the current agent
    • the sender is another configured agent bot in a mention-only channel
  • ensured quoted/later examples do not satisfy mention gating

File changed

src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.test.ts

Test coverage added locally

The local patch adds regression tests for cases including:

  • home-channel messages that explicitly mention another configured agent
  • home-channel plain-text delegation to another configured agent
  • plain agent names not counting as valid mentions in mention-gated channels
  • mention-gated home channels dropping messages that target another agent by plain name
  • non-agent human mentions still being allowed
  • unrelated role mentions being dropped
  • role mentions with role names matching an agent being treated as valid agent mentions
  • quoted role mentions later in the message being ignored
  • cross-channel mentions sent by another configured agent bot being dropped

Scale of Local Patch

Local patch stats:

  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.ts
  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.test.ts
  • 954 insertions, 5 deletions

Local commit message:

  • fix: tighten discord mention gating

Suggested Repro Cases

These are the cases I would use to reproduce:

  1. In a home channel for agent A, send a message explicitly mentioning agent B Expected: drop for A

  2. In a home channel for agent A, send plain-text delegation like:

  • “get Codey to help” Expected: drop for A
  1. In a mention-required channel, include the target agent/role mention only in a later quoted/example paragraph Expected: drop

  2. Mention an unrelated role in a guild channel Expected: drop unless that role clearly maps to the current agent

  3. Send a message from another configured agent bot in a mention-only channel Expected: drop to prevent cross-agent loops

Impact

This affects Discord routing correctness and can produce:

  • incorrect replies in the wrong channels
  • noisy cross-agent behavior
  • false-positive mention detection
  • possible bot-to-bot triggering in mention-only paths

Notes

I do not have push access to the repo, so I am reporting the fix details here in enough detail for maintainers to reproduce or reimplement it directly.

Root Cause

Instead, the current behavior can allow messages through when they should be dropped because:

  • the message is really targeting another configured agent
  • the message contains another role mention, not the current agent
  • the apparent “mention” is only present later in quoted/copied text
  • the sender is another configured agent bot in a mention-gated channel
  • a plain-text delegation like “get Codey to help” is allowed in the current agent’s home channel instead of being ignored/rerouted

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Test coverage added locally

The local patch adds regression tests for cases including:

Scale of Local Patch

Local patch stats:

  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.ts
  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.test.ts
  • 954 insertions, 5 deletions

Code Example

Logs / evidence:
  - Private/local install, so I cannot attach externally accessible logs or file
  paths.
  - The issue was reproduced in live Discord routing with a Nudge-bound Discord
  account using the default Discord account route.
  - Local investigation isolated the problem to Discord preflight mention gating,
  where attention detection was too broad and could count later quoted mentions,
  unrelated role mentions, or other-agent targets as valid attention for the
  current agent.
  - A local fix resolved this by restricting mention detection to a short opening
  attention window, detecting other configured Discord agents as competing
  targets, and tightening role-mention handling.
  - Local regression coverage for the fix included:
    - another configured agent explicitly mentioned in the current agent’s home
  channel
    - plain-text delegation to another configured agent
    - unrelated role mentions
    - quoted later mentions
    - role labels that map to the current agent
    - another configured agent bot speaking in a mention-gated path
  - Local patch size:
    - 2 files changed
    - 954 insertions
    - 5 deletions
    - commit message: fix: tighten discord mention gating
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug type

Regression (worked before, now fails)

Summary

Summary

I found a Discord preflight / mention-gating bug where message handling is too permissive in some agent-routing cases.

The issue is not just “mention required vs not required”. The preflight logic can still treat the wrong content as attention for the current agent, especially when:

  • another configured agent is being addressed
  • a role mention is present
  • an agent/role mention appears later in quoted text
  • a configured agent bot is the sender in a mention-only channel
  • a home-channel message names a different configured agent

This leads to incorrect routing / reply decisions in Discord.

Observed Problem

Discord message preflight should be strict about who is being addressed right now.

Instead, the current behavior can allow messages through when they should be dropped because:

  • the message is really targeting another configured agent
  • the message contains another role mention, not the current agent
  • the apparent “mention” is only present later in quoted/copied text
  • the sender is another configured agent bot in a mention-gated channel
  • a plain-text delegation like “get Codey to help” is allowed in the current agent’s home channel instead of being ignored/rerouted

Expected Behavior

Discord preflight should:

  • only treat the current agent as mentioned when the attention signal is clearly for that agent
  • ignore later quoted mentions / pasted examples
  • drop messages that explicitly target another configured agent
  • drop unrelated role mentions
  • avoid cross-agent bot-trigger loops in mention-only channels
  • avoid broad “search the whole message” behavior for mention detection

Root Cause

The preflight mention logic needs tighter attention scoping and stricter handling of other-agent / role mentions.

The local fix did three main things:

1. Limit mention detection to the attention window

Instead of treating the whole message body as equally relevant, the fix derives a short attention window:

  • normalize newlines
  • take the first paragraph
  • collapse whitespace
  • truncate to 240 chars

This prevents a quoted command/example later in the message from being treated as an active mention.

Local constant added:

  • DISCORD_MENTION_ATTENTION_WINDOW_CHARS = 240

Helper added:

  • extractDiscordMentionAttentionText(text)

2. Detect when another configured Discord agent is being addressed

The fix enumerates configured Discord-bound agents from bindings and checks whether the message is actually naming / mentioning another configured agent.

Helpers added:

  • hasAgentSpecificMentionConfig(...)
  • isConfiguredDiscordAgentSender(...)
  • resolveOtherMentionedDiscordAgents(...)

This allows preflight to drop messages when:

  • another configured agent is explicitly mentioned
  • another configured agent is delegated to by name in plain text
  • another configured agent bot is the sender in a mention-only channel

3. Treat role mentions more carefully

Role mentions were tightened so that:

  • a role mention only counts if it appears in the attention window
  • role labels can match agent names where appropriate
  • unrelated role mentions cause the message to be dropped
  • quoted role mentions later in the message do not count as a current mention

Helpers added:

  • matchesRoleLabelInText(...)
  • resolveMentionedRoleAttention(...)

Local Implementation Details

File changed

src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.ts

Main behavior changes

  • added a 240-char attention window for mention detection
  • built “current-agent mention text” from:
    • short attention text
    • role labels found in the attention window
  • resolved “other mentioned agents” from configured Discord bindings
  • dropped guild messages when:
    • another configured agent is mentioned
    • another role is mentioned and it is not the current agent
    • the sender is another configured agent bot in a mention-only channel
  • ensured quoted/later examples do not satisfy mention gating

File changed

src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.test.ts

Test coverage added locally

The local patch adds regression tests for cases including:

  • home-channel messages that explicitly mention another configured agent
  • home-channel plain-text delegation to another configured agent
  • plain agent names not counting as valid mentions in mention-gated channels
  • mention-gated home channels dropping messages that target another agent by plain name
  • non-agent human mentions still being allowed
  • unrelated role mentions being dropped
  • role mentions with role names matching an agent being treated as valid agent mentions
  • quoted role mentions later in the message being ignored
  • cross-channel mentions sent by another configured agent bot being dropped

Scale of Local Patch

Local patch stats:

  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.ts
  • src/discord/monitor/message-handler.preflight.test.ts
  • 954 insertions, 5 deletions

Local commit message:

  • fix: tighten discord mention gating

Suggested Repro Cases

These are the cases I would use to reproduce:

  1. In a home channel for agent A, send a message explicitly mentioning agent B Expected: drop for A

  2. In a home channel for agent A, send plain-text delegation like:

  • “get Codey to help” Expected: drop for A
  1. In a mention-required channel, include the target agent/role mention only in a later quoted/example paragraph Expected: drop

  2. Mention an unrelated role in a guild channel Expected: drop unless that role clearly maps to the current agent

  3. Send a message from another configured agent bot in a mention-only channel Expected: drop to prevent cross-agent loops

Impact

This affects Discord routing correctness and can produce:

  • incorrect replies in the wrong channels
  • noisy cross-agent behavior
  • false-positive mention detection
  • possible bot-to-bot triggering in mention-only paths

Notes

I do not have push access to the repo, so I am reporting the fix details here in enough detail for maintainers to reproduce or reimplement it directly.

Steps to reproduce

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Configure two Discord-bound agents, for example agent A and agent B, each with normal routing/bindings.
  2. Send a message in agent A’s home channel that explicitly targets agent B, for example: @agent-b can you handle this?
  3. Observe that agent A can still pass preflight / treat the message as eligible instead of dropping it.

Additional cases that reproduce the same class of bug:

  1. In agent A’s home channel, send plain-text delegation to another configured agent, for example: get Codey to help with this

  2. Observe that agent A may still treat this as valid input instead of recognizing it targets another agent.

  3. In a mention-gated channel, send a message where the only apparent agent/role mention appears later in quoted text, for example: Here is the example someone told me to send: @agent-a please help

  4. Observe that the later quoted mention can satisfy mention gating even though it is not the active attention target.

  5. In a guild channel, mention an unrelated role that does not correspond to the current agent.

  6. Observe that preflight can be too permissive instead of dropping the message.

  7. In a mention-only channel, send a message from another configured agent bot.

  8. Observe risk of cross-agent triggering instead of the message being dropped.

Then add this right after it:

Expected behavior

Expected Result

Preflight should only allow the message through when the current agent is clearly the active target in the opening attention text. Messages targeting another configured agent, unrelated roles, quoted later mentions, or other agent bots in mention-only paths should be dropped.

Actual behavior

Actual Result

Preflight can be too permissive and allow messages through based on broader message scanning, later quoted mentions, or other-agent/role signals that should not count as active attention for the current agent.

OpenClaw version

2026.3.9 (19b9637)

Operating system

macOS 26.3.1 (build 25D2128)

Install method

ppm

Model

moonshot/kimi-k2.5

Provider / routing chain

Discord -> accountId "default" -> token provider "discord_tokens" -> route binding to agentId "nudge" -> model moonshot/kimi-k2.5 Config file location: /Users/nudge/.openclaw/openclaw.json

Config file / key location

No response

Additional provider/model setup details

No response

Logs, screenshots, and evidence

Logs / evidence:
  - Private/local install, so I cannot attach externally accessible logs or file
  paths.
  - The issue was reproduced in live Discord routing with a Nudge-bound Discord
  account using the default Discord account route.
  - Local investigation isolated the problem to Discord preflight mention gating,
  where attention detection was too broad and could count later quoted mentions,
  unrelated role mentions, or other-agent targets as valid attention for the
  current agent.
  - A local fix resolved this by restricting mention detection to a short opening
  attention window, detecting other configured Discord agents as competing
  targets, and tightening role-mention handling.
  - Local regression coverage for the fix included:
    - another configured agent explicitly mentioned in the current agent’s home
  channel
    - plain-text delegation to another configured agent
    - unrelated role mentions
    - quoted later mentions
    - role labels that map to the current agent
    - another configured agent bot speaking in a mention-gated path
  - Local patch size:
    - 2 files changed
    - 954 insertions
    - 5 deletions
    - commit message: fix: tighten discord mention gating

Impact and severity

No response

Additional information

Suggested Fix Direction

Tighten Discord preflight mention detection so attention is determined from a short opening window rather than the full message body.

Implementation approach:

  • normalize newlines
  • inspect only the first paragraph / opening attention text
  • collapse whitespace
  • truncate mention detection to a short window (for example 240 chars)
  • ignore agent/role mentions that appear later in quoted or pasted text
  • detect when another configured Discord agent is the actual target and drop for the current agent
  • treat unrelated role mentions as non-matching
  • drop messages from other configured agent bots in mention-only channels

Regression coverage should include:

  • another configured agent explicitly mentioned in the current agent’s home channel
  • plain-text delegation to another configured agent
  • unrelated role mentions
  • quoted later mentions
  • role labels that map to the current agent
  • another configured agent bot speaking in a mention-gated path

extent analysis

Fix Plan

To address the Discord preflight mention gating issue, follow these steps:

  1. Implement a short attention window for mention detection:

    • Normalize newlines in the message text.
    • Extract the first paragraph of the message.
    • Collapse whitespace to ensure accurate mention detection.
    • Truncate the mention detection to a short window (e.g., 240 characters).
  2. Detect and handle other configured Discord agents:

    • Enumerate configured Discord-bound agents from bindings.
    • Check if the message targets another configured agent by name or mention.
    • Drop messages intended for other agents.
  3. Tighten role mention handling:

    • Only consider role mentions within the attention window.
    • Match role labels to agent names where appropriate.
    • Drop messages with unrelated role mentions.

Example Code Snippets ( TypeScript ):

// Helper function to extract attention text
function extractDiscordMentionAttentionText(text: string): string {
  // Normalize newlines and extract the first paragraph
  const normalizedText = text.replace(/\n/g, ' ').split('. ')[0];
  // Collapse whitespace and truncate to 240 characters
  return normalizedText.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').substring(0, 240);
}

// Function to check if another configured agent is mentioned
function hasAgentSpecificMentionConfig(messageText: string, agents: string[]): boolean {
  // Iterate through configured agents and check for mentions
  for (const agent of agents) {
    if (messageText.includes(`@${agent}`) || messageText.includes(agent)) {
      return true;
    }
  }
  return false;
}

// Example usage in preflight logic
const attentionText = extractDiscordMentionAttentionText(messageText);
const otherAgentMentioned = hasAgentSpecificMentionConfig(attentionText, configuredAgents);

if (otherAgentMentioned) {
  // Drop the message
} else {
  // Proceed with normal preflight logic
}

Verification

To verify the fix, test the following scenarios:

  • Messages explicitly mentioning another configured agent in the current agent's home channel should be dropped.
  • Plain-text delegations to another configured agent should be dropped.
  • Unrelated role mentions should not trigger mention gating.
  • Quoted or later mentions should not satisfy mention gating.
  • Messages from other configured agent bots in mention-only channels should be dropped.

Extra Tips

  • Ensure thorough regression testing to cover various mention scenarios and edge cases.
  • Review and refine the attention window size (e.g., 240 characters) based on specific requirements and testing outcomes.
  • Consider implementing logging or analytics to monitor mention gating effectiveness and identify potential issues.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING