vllm - ✅(Solved) Fix [Bug]: Docker Hub's vllm-openai Docker image is *still* not usable since 0.14. [1 pull requests, 2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
vllm-project/vllm#40872Fetched 2026-04-26 05:06:18
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
commented ×2closed ×1cross-referenced ×1labeled ×1

Fix Action

Fixed

PR fix notes

PR #40874: [docs] clarify docker compose command arg for vLLM image

Description (problem / solution / changelog)

Two issues (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/40872 and https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/32755) say that vllm/vllm-openai under Docker Compose fails when passing -cc / --compilation-config.

This is likely bc of bad compose command construction by the user.

This PR prevents that by adding an example of the safe Compose form to the doc they got it from.

command:
  - Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B
  - --compilation-config.mode=3

Changed files

  • docs/getting_started/installation/gpu.cuda.inc.md (modified, +15/-0)
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Your current environment

This is the original issue. I fear it's lost in the depths: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/32755

This is the fix: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32809

I really hope this fix gets included into 0.20.0 or 0.20.1.

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The fix for the issue is available in pull request #32809 and should be included in version 0.20.0 or 0.20.1.

Guidance

  • Review the fix in pull request #32809 to understand the changes made to resolve the issue.
  • Check the release notes for version 0.20.0 or 0.20.1 to confirm if the fix is included.
  • If the fix is not included in the upcoming release, consider reaching out to the maintainers to request its inclusion.
  • Verify that the issue is resolved by testing with the updated version once it's released.

Notes

The issue lacks specific technical details, so it's difficult to provide a more detailed analysis or code example.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Wait for the release of version 0.20.0 or 0.20.1, which should include the fix from pull request #32809.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING