openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: Memory management is in chaos [6 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#43747Fetched 2026-04-08 00:17:32
View on GitHub
Comments
6
Participants
2
Timeline
7
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
commented ×6labeled ×1

Me and my collegues (3 people) are using openclaw. I never see any of our memory is managed in sameway.

  • Mine keeps doing chunking & embedding and store into ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite
  • My collegue A, her claw is storing markdown files into ~/.openclaw/workspace-main/memory/2026-03-12.md and creates such a file per day.
  • My collegue B, his claw not remember anything.

Root Cause

Me and my collegues (3 people) are using openclaw. I never see any of our memory is managed in sameway.

  • Mine keeps doing chunking & embedding and store into ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite
  • My collegue A, her claw is storing markdown files into ~/.openclaw/workspace-main/memory/2026-03-12.md and creates such a file per day.
  • My collegue B, his claw not remember anything.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug type

Regression (worked before, now fails)

Summary

Me and my collegues (3 people) are using openclaw. I never see any of our memory is managed in sameway.

  • Mine keeps doing chunking & embedding and store into ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite
  • My collegue A, her claw is storing markdown files into ~/.openclaw/workspace-main/memory/2026-03-12.md and creates such a file per day.
  • My collegue B, his claw not remember anything.

Steps to reproduce

We don't need to reproduce anything. We just need a rewrite on memory management session, make strict defination on this thing.

Expected behavior

All behave the same.

Actual behavior

OpenClaw version

2026.3.8

Operating system

macOS 26.2

Install method

npm global

Model

claude-sonnet

Provider / routing chain

openclaw->gateway->provider

Config file / key location

No response

Additional provider/model setup details

No response

Logs, screenshots, and evidence

Impact and severity

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

Fix Plan

To achieve consistent memory management across all users, we need to standardize the memory storage approach in OpenClaw.

  • Step 1: Define a unified storage method. For simplicity, let's choose SQLite as the standard storage solution, similar to what's currently being used by the first user.
  • Step 2: Update the OpenClaw configuration to enforce this standard across all users. This might involve setting a default storage path and method in the OpenClaw configuration file.

Example configuration update:

# In ~/.openclaw/config.yml or equivalent
memory:
  storage: sqlite
  path: ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite
  • Step 3: Implement a check in the OpenClaw startup routine to ensure the defined storage method is used. If a different method is detected, the system should migrate to the standardized approach.

Example migration code snippet (in a hypothetical OpenClaw settings loader):

import os
import sqlite3

def load_settings():
    # Load existing settings
    settings_path = os.path.expanduser('~/.openclaw/config.yml')
    # ... load YAML settings ...

    # Check and enforce storage method
    if settings['memory']['storage'] != 'sqlite':
        # Migrate to SQLite
        migrate_to_sqlite(settings)

def migrate_to_sqlite(settings):
    # Create SQLite database if it doesn't exist
    db_path = os.path.expanduser(settings['memory']['path'])
    if not os.path.exists(db_path):
        with sqlite3.connect(db_path) as conn:
            # Initialize database schema
            conn.execute('CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS memories (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, content TEXT)')
    # ... migrate existing data to SQLite ...

Verification

To verify that the fix worked, each user should:

  1. Restart OpenClaw.
  2. Check that their memory is now being stored in the standardized location (~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite).
  3. Confirm that all users see consistent behavior in terms of memory management.

Extra Tips

  • Regularly back up the SQLite database to prevent data loss.
  • Consider implementing a periodic cleanup mechanism to manage the size of the database.
  • For future updates, ensure that any changes to the memory management system are thoroughly tested across different user configurations to prevent regressions.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

All behave the same.

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: Memory management is in chaos [6 comments, 2 participants]