claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Model Hallucination: Incorrect Reasoning Confidence Without Evidence Verification

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Root Cause

Bug Description The model hallucinates a lot.. It debugs an issue and reports the reason for the bug in full confidence. Then I provide it some evidences to prove that his reasoning is wrong.. Then it checks again and finds out that the earlier reasoning was wrong and the actual reason is something else.. This has happened a lot of times

Code Example

[]
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description The model hallucinates a lot.. It debugs an issue and reports the reason for the bug in full confidence. Then I provide it some evidences to prove that his reasoning is wrong.. Then it checks again and finds out that the earlier reasoning was wrong and the actual reason is something else.. This has happened a lot of times

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: iTerm.app
  • Version: 2.1.114
  • Feedback ID: 5c36e454-2f9f-40e0-99d7-b8b5c541c78f

Errors

[]

extent analysis

TL;DR

The model's tendency to "hallucinate" and provide incorrect reasoning for bugs may be mitigated by providing more accurate and relevant evidence to challenge its initial conclusions.

Guidance

  • Review the evidence provided to the model to ensure it is accurate, relevant, and sufficient to challenge the model's initial reasoning.
  • Consider providing additional context or constraints to help the model narrow down the possible causes of the bug.
  • Verify that the model is correctly interpreting the evidence and not relying on flawed assumptions or biases.
  • Evaluate the model's performance on a diverse set of test cases to identify potential patterns or areas for improvement.

Notes

The issue lacks specific technical details about the model's architecture, training data, or algorithms used, making it challenging to provide a more targeted solution.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Provide high-quality, relevant evidence to challenge the model's initial conclusions, as this may help improve the model's accuracy and reduce "hallucination".

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug] Model Hallucination: Incorrect Reasoning Confidence Without Evidence Verification