vllm - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: qwen3 235B model with latest vllm is going to generate only 1 token. [6 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
vllm-project/vllm#38176Fetched 2026-04-08 01:31:50
View on GitHub
Comments
6
Participants
3
Timeline
13
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
commented ×6mentioned ×3subscribed ×3labeled ×1

Code Example

Your output of `python collect_env.py` here
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Your current environment

<details> <summary>The output of <code>python collect_env.py</code></summary> {"id":"chatcmpl-aa0eee89354cdf40","object":"chat.completion","created":1774490978,"model":"Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct-AWQ","choices":[{"index":0,"message":{"role":"assistant","content":"","refusal":null,"annotations":null,"audio":null,"function_call":null,"tool_calls":[],"reasoning":null},"logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"stop","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null}],"service_tier":null,"system_fingerprint":null,"usage":{"prompt_tokens":16,"total_tokens":17,"completion_tokens":1,"prompt_tokens_details":null},"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null,"kv_transfer_params":null} Thu Mar 26 02:09:38 AM UTC 2026 ```text Your output of `python collect_env.py` here ``` </details>

🐛 Describe the bug

after I upgraded to the latest vllm version, qwen3 235b can't produce any tokens. not sure where is the problem.

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.

extent analysis

Fix Plan

The issue seems to be related to the upgrade of the VLLM version, which is causing the Qwen3 235B model to fail in producing tokens. To fix this, we can try the following steps:

  • Check the compatibility of the Qwen3 235B model with the latest VLLM version.
  • Update the model configuration to match the new VLLM version requirements.
  • Verify that the collect_env.py script is correctly configured and running without errors.

Here's an example code snippet to update the model configuration:

import torch

# Load the Qwen3 235B model
model = torch.load('qwen3_235b.pth')

# Update the model configuration to match the new VLLM version
model.config.update({
    'vllm_version': 'latest',
    'tokenization': 'updated_tokenizer'
})

# Save the updated model configuration
torch.save(model, 'qwen3_235b_updated.pth')

Additionally, you can try to reset the model's weights and biases to their default values:

# Reset the model's weights and biases
model.apply(weights_init)

Make sure to replace weights_init with the actual function or method that initializes the model's weights and biases.

Verification

To verify that the fix worked, you can try running the collect_env.py script again and check if the Qwen3 235B model is producing tokens correctly. You can also test the model on a sample input to ensure it's working as expected.

Extra Tips

  • Make sure to check the VLLM documentation for any specific requirements or updates for the Qwen3 235B model.
  • If the issue persists, try rolling back to a previous version of the VLLM and see if the model works correctly.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

vllm - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: qwen3 235B model with latest vllm is going to generate only 1 token. [6 comments, 3 participants]