litellm - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: sk- prefix missing [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
BerriAI/litellm#27849Fetched 2026-05-14 03:30:12
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2

Error Message

  1. {"error":{"message":"Authentication Error, LiteLLM Virtual Key expected. Received=d204****fd5c, expected to start with 'sk-'.","type":"auth_error","param":"None","code":"401"}}
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Check for existing issues

  • I have searched the existing issues and checked that my issue is not a duplicate.

What happened?

If users created by bulk invite the given access tokens in the response csv doesn't have a sk- prefix and getting rejected on any call.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. create users by bulk invite csv upload
  2. Download the credentials file containing Virtual Keys and invitation links. Users will need these Virtual Keys to make LLM requests through LiteLLM.
  3. {"error":{"message":"Authentication Error, LiteLLM Virtual Key expected. Received=d204****fd5c, expected to start with 'sk-'.","type":"auth_error","param":"None","code":"401"}}

Relevant log output

What part of LiteLLM is this about?

UI Dashboard

What LiteLLM version are you on ?

v1.83.10

Twitter / LinkedIn details

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

litellm - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Bug]: sk- prefix missing [1 participants]