Issue Station
Sign In
Tools hereToolbox

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] /ultrareview crashes before producing findings, but consumes quota [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#53283•Fetched 2026-04-26 05:19:39
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
11
Reactions
0
Author
tlrktztlrktz
Participants
github-actions[bot]github-actions[bot]tlrktztlrktz
Timeline (top)
labeled ×5cross-referenced ×4commented ×1unlabeled ×1

Error Message

/ultrareview 1
⎿ Free ultrareview 1 of 3.
Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF

⏺ Ultrareview is running — I'll surface findings when they come in.

⏺ Remote review completed
⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited

❯ Continue

⏺ The remote review crashed before producing findings. You may want to retry with /ultrareview again.

❯ /ultrareview 1
⎿ Free ultrareview 2 of 3. Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ

⏺ Retrying — I'll share findings when they land.

⏺ Remote review completed ⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited

❯ Now it's using my limited Ultrareview credits. I'm scared to run it again because I only have 3, and it's telling me I've used them up. This sucks.

⏺ That's frustrating — both runs crashed server-side before producing findings, which shouldn't count against your quota. I'd recommend reporting this at https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues with the two session IDs (session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF and session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ) so the team can refund the credits and investigate the crash.

Root Cause

❯ Now it's using my limited Ultrareview credits. I'm scared to run it again because I only have 3, and it's telling me I've used them up. This sucks.

Code Example

/ultrareview 1                                                                                                        
  ⎿  Free ultrareview 1 of 3.                                                                                           
     Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF                                                            
                                                                                                                        
⏺ Ultrareview is running — I'll surface findings when they come in.                                                     
                                                                                                                        
⏺ Remote review completed                                                                                               
  ⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited                           
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
❯ Continue                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                        
⏺ The remote review crashed before producing findings. You may want to retry with /ultrareview again.

❯ /ultrareview 1                                                                                                           
  ⎿  Free ultrareview 2 of 3.
     Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ

⏺ Retrying — I'll share findings when they land.

⏺ Remote review completed
  ⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited

❯ Now it's using my limited Ultrareview credits. I'm scared to run it again because I only have 3, and it's telling me I've used them up. This sucks.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                           
⏺ That's frustrating — both runs crashed server-side before producing findings, which shouldn't count against your quota. I'd recommend reporting this at https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues with the two session IDs (session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF and session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ) so the team can refund the credits and investigate the crash.
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Two consecutive /ultrareview runs against the same PR crashed server-side before producing any findings, yet both were counted against my free quota (2 of 3 used). I'm now reluctant to retry with my last remaining credit.

Target PR: tlrktz/fids-review-2#1

Affected sessions:

  • session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF
  • session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ

Output returned in both cases: {"error":"Review crashed before producing findings. See session logs for details."}

Expected behavior:

  • The review completes and returns findings, OR
  • If the review crashes before producing findings, the run should not be counted against the free quota.

Requests:

  1. Refund the 2 consumed credits, since neither run produced output.
  2. Investigate the crash via the session logs above.
  3. Consider making quota consumption contingent on a successful findings response.

Environment:

  • Claude Code CLI
  • Platform: darwin (macOS)
  • Repo: git, branch initial

What Should Happen?

  • The review completes and returns findings, OR
  • If the review crashes before producing findings, the run should not be counted against the free quota.

Error Messages/Logs

/ultrareview 1                                                                                                        
  ⎿  Free ultrareview 1 of 3.                                                                                           
     Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF                                                            
                                                                                                                        
⏺ Ultrareview is running — I'll surface findings when they come in.                                                     
                                                                                                                        
⏺ Remote review completed                                                                                               
  ⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited                           
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
❯ Continue                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                        
⏺ The remote review crashed before producing findings. You may want to retry with /ultrareview again.

❯ /ultrareview 1                                                                                                           
  ⎿  Free ultrareview 2 of 3.
     Ultrareview launched for tlrktz/fids-review-2#1 (~5-10 min, runs in the cloud). Track: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ

⏺ Retrying — I'll share findings when they land.

⏺ Remote review completed
  ⎿  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited

❯ Now it's using my limited Ultrareview credits. I'm scared to run it again because I only have 3, and it's telling me I've used them up. This sucks.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                           
⏺ That's frustrating — both runs crashed server-side before producing findings, which shouldn't count against your quota. I'd recommend reporting this at https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues with the two session IDs (session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF and session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ) so the team can refund the credits and investigate the crash.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Start Claude Code
  2. Run /ultrareview
  3. "API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited"
  4. Ultrareview credit is decremented without having received anything for it

Claude Model

Opus

Is this a regression?

I don't know

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.1.119

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

Terminal.app (macOS)

Additional Information

<img width="993" height="677" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d08ff4c8-d34e-4536-ba5f-ea4d8cf22c53" />

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue can be addressed by reporting the problem to the Claude Code team with the provided session IDs to investigate the crash and potentially refund the consumed credits.

Guidance

  • Report the issue to the Claude Code team with the session IDs session_01Mx5fMyYWY5u4b5hrBHWCpF and session_01XwsyDgEA8NTfMaN3WsbaPQ to investigate the crash.
  • Request a refund of the 2 consumed credits since neither run produced output.
  • Consider waiting for the team's response before attempting another /ultrareview run to avoid further credit consumption.
  • Review the session logs for details on the crash, as mentioned in the error message.

Example

No code snippet is necessary for this issue, as it appears to be related to the Claude Code service and its credit system rather than a code problem.

Notes

The root cause of the issue seems to be a server-side crash during the /ultrareview process, which is not directly related to the user's code or environment. The team's investigation and potential refund of credits are necessary to resolve the issue.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Report the issue and wait for the team's response before taking further action, as this approach allows for the team to investigate and potentially refund the credits without risking additional credit consumption.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…
#api#cache error#pipeline error#runtime error#dependency conflict

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] /ultrareview crashes before producing findings, but consumes quota [1 comments, 2 participants]