Issue Station
Sign In
Tools hereToolbox

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] Wasted /ultrareview because of interruption [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#55126•Fetched 2026-05-01 05:45:34
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
6
Reactions
0
Author
MarcoZabunjeMarcoZabunje
Participants
github-actions[bot]github-actions[bot]MarcoZabunjeMarcoZabunje
Timeline (top)
labeled ×5commented ×1

Error Message

"Remote review completed  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited"

Root Cause

And upon trying to ultrareview again I saw that I now about to use my second token for ultrareview, meaning the first one was essentially wasted because you rate limited in the middle of it, and I didn't get a review but am missing a token.

Code Example

"Remote review completed
   API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate
     limited"
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

I ran /ultrareview on my branch and it kicked off fine and then it got interrupted by "Remote review completed  API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited"

And upon trying to ultrareview again I saw that I now about to use my second token for ultrareview, meaning the first one was essentially wasted because you rate limited in the middle of it, and I didn't get a review but am missing a token.

The problem: I started this session with 3 free ultrareviews. After all of the above one run that returned nothing useful, one that got rate-limited.

What I'd expect:

  • A run that returns empty findings on a 240k-line diff probably shouldn't count (or should at least be flagged so the user knows to rescope).
  • A run that's cancelled should definitely not count.
  • A rate-limit error from your end shouldn't burn a credit either.

Session info:

  • First run session: session_013GpWRdmK429im6xxKp1cn8
  • Branch: feature/engine-foundation → main
  • Diff size: 896 files, 243,134 insertions
  • Date: 2026-04-30

What Should Happen?

Could you take a look and refund the credits if this matches what your logs show? Happy to provide more detail if useful.

Error Messages/Logs

"Remote review completed
   API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate
     limited"

Steps to Reproduce

I'm not sure

Claude Model

Opus

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

No response

Claude Code Version

2.1.123

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

Other Linux

Terminal/Shell

Other

Additional Information

My Claude account is associated with the email [email protected]

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue can be mitigated by requesting a credit refund for the interrupted ultrareview session that was rate-limited by the server.

Guidance

  • Verify the session details (session_013GpWRdmK429im6xxKp1cn8) and error message ("Remote review completed API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate limited") to ensure it matches the described scenario.
  • Check the Claude Code documentation or support channels to see if there are any existing procedures for handling rate-limited sessions and potential credit refunds.
  • If the issue is confirmed to be a regression, consider reaching out to the development team to report the bug and request a fix.
  • Provide additional details, such as the diff size (896 files, 243,134 insertions) and date (2026-04-30), to help the support team investigate the issue.

Notes

The solution relies on the support team's ability to verify the session details and error message, and their policies regarding credit refunds for interrupted sessions.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Request a credit refund for the interrupted ultrareview session, as the server rate limit error should not burn a credit.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…
#api#SSR setup#ISR setup#authentication setup#request error

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [BUG] Wasted /ultrareview because of interruption [1 comments, 2 participants]