openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Cache hit rate shows 28.5% in Control UI after upgrading to 2026.4.2 [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#60897Fetched 2026-04-08 02:45:57
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
0
Reactions
0

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

After upgrading to OpenClaw 2026.4.2, the cache hit rate displayed in the Control UI shows only 28.5%, which seems unusually low.\n\n## Environment\n- OpenClaw version: 2026.4.2\n- Platform: Windows\n- Model: minimax/MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed\n\n## Expected behavior\nCache hit rate should be significantly higher (previously observed around 68-79%)\n\n## Actual behavior\nControl UI shows cache hit rate at 28.5%\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n1. Upgrade to 2026.4.2\n2. Check cache hit rate in Control UI\n\n## Additional context\nThis version includes several changes related to:\n- Agents/compaction (multiple PRs)\n- Providers/runtime (replay hook surfaces added)\n- Various provider/transport changes\n\nIs this a known issue or is there a change in how cache hit rate is calculated in this version?

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

After upgrading to OpenClaw 2026.4.2, the cache hit rate displayed in the Control UI shows only 28.5%, which seems unusually low.\n\n## Environment\n- OpenClaw version: 2026.4.2\n- Platform: Windows\n- Model: minimax/MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed\n\n## Expected behavior\nCache hit rate should be significantly higher (previously observed around 68-79%)\n\n## Actual behavior\nControl UI shows cache hit rate at 28.5%\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n1. Upgrade to 2026.4.2\n2. Check cache hit rate in Control UI\n\n## Additional context\nThis version includes several changes related to:\n- Agents/compaction (multiple PRs)\n- Providers/runtime (replay hook surfaces added)\n- Various provider/transport changes\n\nIs this a known issue or is there a change in how cache hit rate is calculated in this version?

extent analysis

TL;DR

Review the changes related to agents/compaction, providers/runtime, and provider/transport in OpenClaw 2026.4.2 to identify potential causes for the low cache hit rate.

Guidance

  • Investigate the impact of the replay hook surfaces added in the providers/runtime changes on cache behavior.
  • Check if the compaction changes in agents have altered the cache eviction policy or frequency.
  • Verify if the provider/transport changes have introduced any additional latency or overhead that could affect cache hit rates.
  • Compare the cache configuration and settings before and after the upgrade to ensure no unintended changes were made.

Example

No specific code snippet can be provided without more details on the cache implementation and changes.

Notes

The actual cause of the low cache hit rate may be complex and depend on the interplay of multiple factors, including the specific changes made in OpenClaw 2026.4.2 and the environment in which it is deployed.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Review and adjust cache settings and configuration to optimize performance for the new version, as the changes in 2026.4.2 may require tweaks to achieve the previously observed cache hit rates.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING