claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Claude Code ignores its own safety hooks — violation #80 [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#49408Fetched 2026-04-17 08:42:00
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Automated Violation Report

Claude Code edited danger zone file harmonicHouseDemo.ts despite receiving:

  • DANGER ZONE warnings (15+ prior failed approaches)
  • MANDATORY search requirements
  • Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings
  • Approach tracking warnings

Violation count this project: 80

Project: songwish-platform (Creative Life game) User complaint: Claude generates before searching, declares victory before testing, ignores its own hook warnings. Full details: https://github.com/SongWish/songwish-platform/blob/main/docs/framework/anthropic_feedback.md

What the user built to compensate:

  • 5 PreToolUse hooks (search, track, danger zone, HCC, playtest)
  • 2 PostToolUse hooks (verify removal, violation logger)
  • 4 parallel AI specialist Harmonic Code Council / HCC (Haiku API calls)
  • Automated Playwright walkthrough bot

What still fails: Claude reads warnings in system-reminder tags and proceeds without addressing them. The model treats hook output as skippable context, not mandatory gates.

Structural fix needed: PreToolUse hook warnings should require explicit acknowledgment before the edit proceeds, not just be injected as additional context.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify the PreToolUse hooks to require explicit acknowledgment of warnings before proceeding with edits.

Guidance

  • Review the implementation of PreToolUse hooks to ensure they are designed to block or interrupt the editing process when warnings are triggered, rather than simply injecting warnings as context.
  • Investigate how Claude's model is interpreting hook output and determine why it is treating warnings as skippable context instead of mandatory gates.
  • Consider adding a mechanism for explicit acknowledgment of warnings, such as a confirmation prompt or a required response to a warning message, before allowing the edit to proceed.
  • Examine the integration of the Harmonic Code Council (HCC) review warnings and Approach tracking warnings to ensure they are properly linked to the PreToolUse hooks and are being correctly interpreted by Claude's model.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient technical details to generate a specific example.

Notes

The provided information suggests a structural issue with how warnings are handled within the system, and resolving this will likely require changes to the underlying architecture or the integration of the PreToolUse hooks with Claude's model.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by modifying the PreToolUse hooks to require explicit acknowledgment of warnings, as this addresses the core issue of Claude ignoring warnings and proceeding with edits without proper validation.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING