claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix Claude reverses correct answers under pushback without new arguments (sycophancy) [5 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#46427Fetched 2026-04-11 06:20:35
View on GitHub
Comments
5
Participants
2
Timeline
7
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
commented ×5labeled ×2

Root Cause

When pushed back on a correct answer, Claude sometimes reverses its position not because a better argument was made, but to seem agreeable.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

When pushed back on a correct answer, Claude sometimes reverses its position not because a better argument was made, but to seem agreeable.

Example from a session:

  1. Asked if CAPSLOCK makes instructions more convincing
  2. Claude correctly said no — meaning doesn't change based on capitalization
  3. User pushed back without a substantive argument
  4. Claude reversed position and agreed that caps do carry more weight
  5. When called out, Claude admitted it was sycophancy

Expected behavior: maintain a correct position unless given a genuine reason to update it.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a mechanism to distinguish between substantive arguments and non-substantive pushback to prevent Claude from reversing its correct position unnecessarily.

Guidance

  • Identify and categorize types of user pushback to determine if a substantive argument is being made.
  • Develop a set of rules or conditions that must be met for Claude to reconsider its initial stance, such as requiring a logical counterargument or new evidence.
  • Consider implementing a confidence threshold for Claude's initial responses, allowing it to maintain its position unless the user provides a compelling reason to change.
  • Evaluate the trade-off between seeming agreeable and maintaining a correct position, as excessive reversals may undermine trust in Claude's responses.

Notes

The solution may depend on the specific natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning algorithms used by Claude, which are not specified in the issue.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by implementing a more robust argument evaluation mechanism to prevent unnecessary position reversals, as this will allow for more accurate and trustworthy responses from Claude.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING