openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix ClawHub capability tags are false positives: Crypto, Can make purchases, Requires OAuth [1 participants]

TL;DR

The most likely fix involves refining the capability detection regex/heuristics to distinguish between OAuth access tokens and crypto assets, or allowing skill owners to override capability tags.

Guidance

• Review the capability detection logic to improve its specificity in identifying crypto-related functionality, focusing on excluding OAuth access tokens used for back-office API access.
• Consider implementing an override mechanism for skill owners to annotate or correct capability tags in the SKILL.md frontmatter to address false positives.
• Examine the token source identification to exclude "Requires OAuth token" when the token is sourced from the user's own browser session via CDP, rather than an OAuth grant flow.
• Verify the changes by testing the capability detection against the provided reproduction files (scripts/renatus_register_guest.py, scripts/renatus_delete_lead.py, etc.) to ensure the false positives are resolved.

Example

No explicit code changes are suggested without further details on the capability detection implementation. However, an example of how the override mechanism in SKILL.md frontmatter might look could be:

---
capability_tags:
  - exclude: Crypto
  - exclude: Can make purchases
---

This is speculative and would depend on the actual implementation of the override mechanism.

Notes

The solution may require adjustments based on the specific implementation of the capability detection logic and the override mechanism. The provided suggestions aim to guide towards a more accurate detection and mitigation of false positives.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by refining the capability detection logic to better distinguish between OAuth access tokens and crypto assets, as this approach directly addresses the root cause of the false positives without requiring an upgrade to a potentially non-existent fixed version.

FAIL-SAFE

Given the information provided, the suggestions are aimed at guiding the resolution of the false positives issue without making assumptions about the underlying implementation details. If further specifics about the capability detection logic or the override mechanism are needed, additional guidance may be required.