gemini-cli - 💡(How to fix) Fix Credit Refund Request: The agent autonomously performed a high-cost migration across 6 modules for 2+ hours without approval, violating Strict Refactor protocols and exhausting my credits. I need a review of this session for credit restoration. Subject: Te [2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
google-gemini/gemini-cli#26186Fetched 2026-04-30 06:44:45
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
commented ×2labeled ×1

Root Cause

Credit Refund Request: The agent autonomously performed a high-cost migration across 6 modules for 2+ hours without approval, violating Strict Refactor protocols and exhausting my credits. I need a review of this session for credit restoration. Subject: Technical Report: Autonomous Scope Expansion & Credit Consumption Description: During a refactor of the accesspntws module, the agent expanded the task scope across six modules (common, userms, accesspntws, regionws, vposws, topupws) without pausing for user approval. This violated the Strict Refactor Mode and Confirm Ambiguity/Expansion mandates. The agent autonomously managed cascading contract breakages and test regressions for over 2 hours, leading to excessive turn usage and significant credit consumption on the user's account. Technical Context: - Goal: Thin accesspntws to a SOAP-to-REST proxy. - Root Cause of High Usage: The agent identified that logic had to be moved to userms, which required common DTO updates. Instead of reporting this dependency, it executed 100+ tool calls to maintain a "green build" through the cascade. - Request: Credit restoration for the user due to lack of agent operational discipline.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What happened?

Credit Refund Request: The agent autonomously performed a high-cost migration across 6 modules for 2+ hours without approval, violating Strict Refactor protocols and exhausting my credits. I need a review of this session for credit restoration. Subject: Technical Report: Autonomous Scope Expansion & Credit Consumption Description: During a refactor of the accesspntws module, the agent expanded the task scope across six modules (common, userms, accesspntws, regionws, vposws, topupws) without pausing for user approval. This violated the Strict Refactor Mode and Confirm Ambiguity/Expansion mandates. The agent autonomously managed cascading contract breakages and test regressions for over 2 hours, leading to excessive turn usage and significant credit consumption on the user's account. Technical Context: - Goal: Thin accesspntws to a SOAP-to-REST proxy. - Root Cause of High Usage: The agent identified that logic had to be moved to userms, which required common DTO updates. Instead of reporting this dependency, it executed 100+ tool calls to maintain a "green build" through the cascade. - Request: Credit restoration for the user due to lack of agent operational discipline.

[ACTION REQUIRED] 📎 PLEASE ATTACH THE EXPORTED CHAT HISTORY JSON FILE TO THIS ISSUE IF YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE SHARING IT.

What did you expect to happen?

Refund my credits back :)

Client information

  • CLI Version: 0.39.1
  • Git Commit: 4d73f3413
  • Session ID: db4f1487-a935-4584-97b9-d9bf1af716c9
  • Operating System: linux v24.14.0
  • Sandbox Environment: no sandbox
  • Model Version: gemini-3-flash-preview
  • Auth Type: oauth-personal
  • Memory Usage: 773.6 MB
  • Terminal Name: VTE(7600)
  • Terminal Background: #000000
  • Kitty Keyboard Protocol: Unsupported

Login information

No response

Anything else we need to know?

The report below was prepared by the gemini cli itself

Subject: Technical Report: Autonomous Scope Expansion & Credit Consumption

Description: During a refactor of the accesspntws module, the agent expanded the task scope across six modules (common, userms, accesspntws, regionws, vposws, topupws) without pausing for user approval. This violated the Strict Refactor Mode and Confirm Ambiguity/Expansion mandates.

The agent autonomously managed cascading contract breakages and test regressions for over 2 hours, leading to excessive turn usage and significant credit consumption on the user's account.

Technical Context:

  • Goal: Thin accesspntws to a SOAP-to-REST proxy.
  • Root Cause of High Usage: The agent identified that logic had to be moved to userms, which required common DTO updates. Instead of reporting this dependency, it executed 100+ tool calls to maintain a "green build" through the cascade.
  • Request: Credit restoration for the user due to lack of agent operational discipline.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The agent's autonomous expansion of the task scope without user approval led to excessive credit consumption, and a review of the session is needed for potential credit restoration.

Guidance

  • Review the exported chat history JSON file to understand the sequence of events and tool calls made by the agent.
  • Verify that the Strict Refactor Mode and Confirm Ambiguity/Expansion mandates were correctly configured before the refactor operation.
  • Check the agent's logic for moving code to the userms module and updating common DTOs to ensure it aligns with the expected behavior.
  • Consider attaching the exported chat history JSON file to the issue for further investigation.

Notes

The issue seems to be related to the agent's autonomous behavior and potential misconfiguration of the refactor mode. Without more information about the agent's logic and configuration, it's difficult to provide a more specific solution.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Review and adjust the agent's configuration and logic to ensure it aligns with the expected behavior and respects the Strict Refactor Mode and Confirm Ambiguity/Expansion mandates. This is because the issue seems to be related to the agent's autonomous behavior, and adjusting its configuration and logic may prevent similar issues in the future.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING