claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [DOCS] Model configuration docs still describe Opus 4.6 effort support instead of Opus 4.7 xhigh [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#49278Fetched 2026-04-17 08:45:48
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
6
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4commented ×1cross-referenced ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Documentation Type

Incorrect/outdated documentation

Documentation Location

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config

Section/Topic

Model aliases / "Adjust effort level"

Current Documentation

The docs currently say:

| sonnet | Uses the latest Sonnet model (currently Sonnet 4.6) for daily coding tasks | | opus | Uses the latest Opus model (currently Opus 4.6) for complex reasoning tasks |

Three levels persist across sessions: low, medium, and high. A fourth level, max, provides the deepest reasoning with no constraint on token spending, so responses are slower and cost more than at high. max is available on Opus 4.6 only and does not persist across sessions except through the CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL environment variable.

Effort is supported on Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6. The effort slider appears in /model when a supported model is selected.

The command reference also says:

/effort [low|medium|high|max|auto] ... max applies to the current session only and requires Opus 4.6.

What's Wrong or Missing?

Changelog v2.1.111 says: Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh is now available! Use /effort to tune speed vs. intelligence.

The current Claude Code docs are outdated for this release:

A. The model documentation still identifies Opus 4.6 as the current/latest Opus model

I found no Opus 4.7 or xhigh references in the current code.claude.com mirror, while model-config still says the latest Opus model is Opus 4.6.

B. The effort documentation still scopes the feature to Opus 4.6-era wording

/effort, --effort, settings, and frontmatter docs still describe effort support using "Opus 4.6 only" wording. After v2.1.111, users need documentation that explains how /effort applies to Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh and what "tune speed vs. intelligence" means for that model.

Without that update, users cannot tell whether Opus 4.7 xhigh is a new model picker entry, how it relates to existing effort levels, or which effort options are supported on the new model.

Suggested Improvement

Update the model and effort documentation for v2.1.111:

  1. In model-config, replace stale "currently Opus 4.6" / "Opus 4.6 only" wording with the current Opus 4.7 xhigh behavior.
  2. Add a short explanation of where users will see Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh (for example, in /model) and how /effort changes the speed vs. intelligence tradeoff on that model.
  3. Clarify whether xhigh is a model variant name, an effort preset, or a label shown alongside existing effort levels so users do not confuse it with high / max.
  4. Update the command, settings, env-var, skill, and subagent references that still describe effort support as Opus 4.6-specific if that restriction is no longer accurate.

Impact

Medium - Makes feature difficult to understand

Additional Context

Affected Pages:

PageLine(s)Context
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config39-40, 157-176Alias table still says latest Opus is 4.6; effort support and max are described with Opus 4.6-specific wording
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands40/effort says max requires Opus 4.6
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/cli-reference67--effort says max is Opus 4.6 only
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/common-workflows525-541Effort tuning is documented only for Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/settings186effortLevel says it is supported on Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/env-vars87CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL says max is Opus 4.6 only
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills199Skill frontmatter still says max is Opus 4.6 only
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/slash-commands199Slash-command frontmatter still says max is Opus 4.6 only
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/sub-agents255Subagent frontmatter still says max is Opus 4.6 only

Total scope: 9 pages affected

Source: Changelog v2.1.111

Exact changelog entry: Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh is now available! Use /effort to tune speed vs. intelligence

extent analysis

TL;DR

Update the documentation to reflect the changes introduced in Changelog v2.1.111, specifically the availability of Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh and its relationship with the /effort command.

Guidance

  • Review the affected pages listed in the issue and update the documentation to replace "Opus 4.6" with "Opus 4.7 xhigh" where relevant.
  • Clarify the meaning of "tune speed vs. intelligence" in the context of the /effort command and Opus 4.7 xhigh.
  • Ensure that the documentation accurately describes the supported effort levels and their relationship to the new model.
  • Verify that all references to effort support are updated to reflect the changes introduced in v2.1.111.

Example

No code snippet is provided as this issue is related to documentation updates.

Notes

The updates should be made to the following pages: model-config, commands, cli-reference, common-workflows, settings, env-vars, skills, slash-commands, and sub-agents.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by updating the documentation to reflect the changes introduced in Changelog v2.1.111, as the issue is caused by outdated documentation.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING