pytorch - 💡(How to fix) Fix DTensor.local_map inconsistently handles pytree on input versus placements [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
pytorch/pytorch#182031Fetched 2026-05-01 05:32:44
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
47
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
mentioned ×21subscribed ×21labeled ×5
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

The current behavior is that it will pytree flatten the arguments, but it treats placements as a flat list to compare against the flattened one. This seems like the worst of both worlds.

cc @awgu @wanchaol @fegin @fduwjj @wz337 @wconstab @d4l3k @pragupta @msaroufim @dcci @aditvenk @weifengpy @tianyu-l @XilunWu @SherlockNoMad @ppwwyyxx @zpcore

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify the comparison logic to handle placements as a nested structure instead of a flat list.

Guidance

  • Review the current implementation of pytree flattening and placement comparison to identify the root cause of the issue.
  • Consider modifying the comparison logic to recursively handle placements as a nested structure, rather than flattening them into a list.
  • Verify that the modified comparison logic correctly handles different scenarios, including nested placements and empty lists.
  • Test the changes with various input cases to ensure the new behavior is consistent and accurate.

Notes

The exact implementation details are not provided, so the suggested modifications are high-level and may require additional changes to the underlying code.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Modify the comparison logic to handle placements as a nested structure, as this approach addresses the root cause of the issue and provides a more accurate comparison.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING