openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix 2026.4.1 exec approval mechanism completely broke existing single-operator setups [2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#59855Fetched 2026-04-08 02:39:45
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
commented ×2mentioned ×1subscribed ×1

Error Message

Exec approval registration failed: Error: gateway closed (1008): pairing required 4. Every command fails with pairing required error despite gateway being healthy

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

2026.4.1 update introduced sandboxing and exec approval changes that completely broke exec for all existing single-operator setups.

What happened:

After updating to 2026.4.1, every exec command immediately fails with:

Exec approval registration failed: Error: gateway closed (1008): pairing required

Even though the gateway is running and healthy, the exec tool cannot register commands without manual approval every single time.

Expected behavior (before this update):

  • exec worked out of the box for local/loopback connections
  • macOS showed a system permission dialog for folder/app access when needed, which was acceptable
  • No additional per-command approval workflow required

What changed in 2026.4.1:

  • Forced exec approval mechanism that requires manual /approve for every single command
  • No migration guide provided
  • No documented way to disable or opt out
  • Existing configs that worked fine are now completely broken with no clear fix
  • This affects ALL existing users upgrading to 4.4.1

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Have a working openclaw setup pre-4.4.1
  2. Update to 2026.4.1
  3. Try running any exec command
  4. Every command fails with pairing required error despite gateway being healthy

Impact:

  • Completely blocks automated workflows
  • Breaks existing single-user/local setups
  • User had to go through 4+ manual /approve interactions just to run basic commands

Requested fix:

Either:

  1. Provide a documented config option to disable exec approvals for local/loopback setups
  2. Auto-approve exec commands when running in single-operator mode
  3. Provide a better migration path for existing users upgrading to 4.4.1

This is a regression that affects all existing users upgrading to 4.4.1.

extent analysis

TL;DR

The most likely fix for the broken exec functionality in the 2026.4.1 update is to provide a documented config option to disable exec approvals for local/loopback setups or auto-approve exec commands in single-operator mode.

Guidance

  • Investigate the possibility of adding a configuration option to disable exec approvals for local connections, which could mitigate the issue for single-operator setups.
  • Consider the feasibility of auto-approving exec commands when running in single-operator mode to minimize manual intervention.
  • Review the update's documentation and release notes for any potential workarounds or temporary fixes that may have been overlooked.
  • Evaluate the impact of the forced exec approval mechanism on automated workflows and existing user configurations to determine the best course of action.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not imply a specific code-based solution.

Notes

The provided guidance is based on the information given in the issue and may not be applicable to all scenarios. The lack of a migration guide and documented way to disable or opt out of the exec approval mechanism limits the available solutions.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by investigating configuration options or potential auto-approval mechanisms, as an upgrade to a fixed version is not currently available. This approach allows for a temporary solution while waiting for a more permanent fix.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING