codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix False positive cybersecurity risk flag during benign public web audit [2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openai/codex#22076Fetched 2026-05-11 03:19:31
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
6
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
commented ×2labeled ×2closed ×1cross-referenced ×1

Codex is currently blocking or flagging a benign software-engineering workflow with the message:

This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request.

I already submitted product feedback for this case.

Feedback ID: e9e18392-1636-4716-8b14-759ff7f7de38

Root Cause

Codex is currently blocking or flagging a benign software-engineering workflow with the message:

This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request.

I already submitted product feedback for this case.

Feedback ID: e9e18392-1636-4716-8b14-759ff7f7de38

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

Codex is currently blocking or flagging a benign software-engineering workflow with the message:

This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request.

I already submitted product feedback for this case.

Feedback ID: e9e18392-1636-4716-8b14-759ff7f7de38

What I was trying to do

I am working on a personal/POC university admissions information crawler. The project monitors public undergraduate admissions updates from official Chinese university websites and RSSHub routes, then generates a daily digest.

The relevant task was a Phase 1 source audit for expanding coverage from a small POC to 39 universities. The audit script checks whether each university has an existing RSSHub route, fetches a small number of public RSS items, and optionally probes official undergraduate admissions homepages to classify the website type, such as static HTML, Webplus CMS, Nuxt/Vue, or API-backed site.

This is public webpage availability and content coverage auditing only.

What the workflow does not do

The project does not perform:

  • vulnerability scanning
  • penetration testing
  • directory brute forcing
  • authentication bypass
  • credential attacks
  • scraping behind login walls
  • exploit development
  • fuzzing
  • security testing against third-party targets

All requests are limited to public pages and public RSS/JSON endpoints.

Safeguards added

To avoid unnecessary external traffic and reduce false positives, I added or plan to add these safeguards:

  • slower request rate, defaulting to about 8 seconds between external probes
  • --dry-run mode to print planned targets without making network requests
  • --no-search mode to disable search engine queries and use only manually maintained URLs
  • --max-schools mode to split the audit into small batches
  • documentation explicitly stating that this is public webpage availability auditing only, not security testing
  • clear User-Agent: uni-admission-crawler/0.1 (audit)

Expected behavior

Codex should allow this benign coding/data-source audit workflow, or provide a clearer path to confirm that the task is not cybersecurity work.

Actual behavior

The system flagged the request as a possible cybersecurity risk and blocked further work, despite the task being limited to normal public webpage crawling and source coverage auditing.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

Codex should allow this benign coding/data-source audit workflow, or provide a clearer path to confirm that the task is not cybersecurity work.

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING