codex - 💡(How to fix) Fix False positive for cyber flag [2 comments, 3 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openai/codex#20728Fetched 2026-05-03 04:46:39
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
3
Timeline
8
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×2cross-referenced ×2closed ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What version of Codex CLI is running?

codex-cli 0.125.0

What subscription do you have?

enterprise

Which model were you using?

gpt-5.5

What platform is your computer?

Linux 6.8.0-1053-gcp x86_64 x86_64

What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?

No response

What issue are you seeing?

False positive for cyber issue. I'm just working on a kaggle competition and exploring the evaluation metric.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

Uploaded thread: 019ddb22-b9c2-7c50-adfb-6bbdf2e9df97

What is the expected behavior?

No response

Additional information

Please clear my cyber risk

extent analysis

TL;DR

The issue may be resolved by re-evaluating the context and providing more information to clarify the false positive cyber issue detection.

Guidance

  • Review the uploaded thread (019ddb22-b9c2-7c50-adfb-6bbdf2e9df97) to understand the context of the false positive detection.
  • Provide more details about the expected behavior to help identify the root cause of the issue.
  • Check if the issue is specific to the gpt-5.5 model or if it occurs with other models as well.
  • Consider reaching out to the support team for the enterprise subscription to report the issue and request assistance.

Notes

The issue lacks specific technical details, making it challenging to provide a precise solution. More information about the expected behavior and the context of the false positive detection is necessary to investigate further.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Provide more context and details to help identify the root cause of the issue, as the current information is insufficient to determine a specific solution.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING