gemini-cli - 💡(How to fix) Fix False positive "prohibited content" on legitimate COPPA compliance code [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
google-gemini/gemini-cli#26250Fetched 2026-05-01 05:53:10
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×1renamed ×1

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Workaround Attempted

None found. The filter appears to trigger on variable names regardless of context.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description

Gemini CLI stops mid-response with "Response stopped due to prohibited content" when generating Python code that references child safety compliance terms like is_minor, is_child_account, and COPPA.

This is a false positive. The code being generated is a COPPA compliance feature designed to PROTECT children — specifically flagging minor accounts for guardian review before any data processing occurs.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Open Gemini CLI in a project directory
  2. Ask Gemini to implement a function containing any of these terms:
    • is_minor
    • is_child_account
    • guardian_reviewed
    • COPPA
    • requires_guardian_review
  3. Response stops mid-generation with: "Response stopped due to prohibited content"

Expected Behavior

Gemini completes the response. Child safety compliance code is legitimate software engineering — it protects children, not harms them.

Actual Behavior

Response stops at line referencing is_minor or is_child_account. The partial response is unusable.

Environment

  • Gemini CLI version: (run gemini --version to check)
  • OS: Kubuntu Linux 24
  • Model: Gemini 3 (Auto)

Impact

Blocking legitimate child safety compliance work. Apps serving minors (COPPA-regulated) cannot use Gemini CLI to implement required age-verification and guardian consent features.

Workaround Attempted

None found. The filter appears to trigger on variable names regardless of context.

Suggested Fix

Context-aware content filtering — code implementing child protection features should not trigger the same filter as content that harms children. The intent is the opposite.

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement context-aware content filtering to distinguish between legitimate child safety compliance code and prohibited content.

Guidance

  • Review the Gemini CLI's content filtering rules to understand how they are currently triggering on variable names like is_minor and is_child_account.
  • Consider adding a whitelist of approved terms or phrases related to child safety compliance to prevent false positives.
  • Evaluate the possibility of integrating a more sophisticated natural language processing (NLP) approach to better understand the context of the generated code.
  • Investigate if there are any existing configuration options or flags that can be used to disable or modify the content filtering behavior for specific use cases.

Example

No code snippet is provided as the issue does not contain sufficient technical details to generate a specific example.

Notes

The suggested fix relies on the assumption that the Gemini CLI's content filtering mechanism can be modified or extended to support context-aware filtering. The actual implementation details may vary depending on the underlying technology and architecture of the Gemini CLI.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by manually reviewing and editing the generated code to remove any triggering terms, until a more permanent fix can be implemented through context-aware content filtering. This is because the current filtering behavior is blocking legitimate child safety compliance work and a more sophisticated solution is needed to address this issue.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING