claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix False positive: Usage Policy block on technical markdown integration task

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

The session was integrating section drafts into a markdown investigation report — a technical document about per-file-type extraction mechanism selection for email attachments. Nothing in the conversation has plausible policy relevance (no security/abuse/ sensitive-content angle; ordinary software-engineering work on a single-user productivity tool).

The blocked turn was a normal continuation of that work — answers to a prior AskUserQuestion plus a request to proceed. Retrying was not attempted before filing this; reporting now while the Request ID is fresh.

Error Message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which

Root Cause

The session was integrating section drafts into a markdown investigation report — a technical document about per-file-type extraction mechanism selection for email attachments. Nothing in the conversation has plausible policy relevance (no security/abuse/ sensitive-content angle; ordinary software-engineering work on a single-user productivity tool).

The blocked turn was a normal continuation of that work — answers to a prior AskUserQuestion plus a request to proceed. Retrying was not attempted before filing this; reporting now while the Request ID is fresh.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

What happened

In the middle of a long-running Claude Code session on a personal project, a routine user message was blocked with:

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Try rephrasing the request or attempting a different approach.

Request ID: req_011CbJsgRw9q1h9LjMxgjbnY

Context

The session was integrating section drafts into a markdown investigation report — a technical document about per-file-type extraction mechanism selection for email attachments. Nothing in the conversation has plausible policy relevance (no security/abuse/ sensitive-content angle; ordinary software-engineering work on a single-user productivity tool).

The blocked turn was a normal continuation of that work — answers to a prior AskUserQuestion plus a request to proceed. Retrying was not attempted before filing this; reporting now while the Request ID is fresh.

Expected behavior

Request handled normally — no Usage Policy intercept on technical markdown editing tasks.

Actual behavior

Hard block returned to the client; user had to interrupt the in-progress workflow to investigate.

Repro

Not deterministically reproducible from the user side — the classifier signal isn't visible. Including the Request ID so the upstream decision can be inspected.

Environment

  • Claude Code in VS Code extension
  • Long session with a large working file (~2,500-line markdown document) loaded in context
  • Model: Opus 4.7 (1M context)

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

FAQ

Expected behavior

Request handled normally — no Usage Policy intercept on technical markdown editing tasks.

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix False positive: Usage Policy block on technical markdown integration task