claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Add Apple Calendar as a vetted Cowork connector [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#57914Fetched 2026-05-11 03:22:05
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3commented ×1

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Current workaround: Community MCP servers on GitHub (unvetted, security risk)

Current workaround: Community MCP servers on GitHub (unvetted, security risk)

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

Request: Apple Calendar is the default calendar on Mac and is used by a large portion of Claude Code's user base. Currently, there is no vetted connector for it in the Cowork customize panel — only community MCP servers, which carry meaningful security risks for professional users.

Requested connector: Apple Calendar (macOS native, via EventKit or CalDAV)

Use case: Allow Claude to read and create calendar events directly through a trusted, Anthropic-vetted connector — the same way Google Calendar is supported.

Current workaround: Community MCP servers on GitHub (unvetted, security risk)

Why this matters: Google Calendar is supported, but many Mac users — especially in enterprise and professional settings — use Apple Calendar natively and do not want to route calendar access through a third-party connector.


You can file it here: [github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/new](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues)

Want me to adjust the tone or add anything before you submit it?

Proposed Solution

Here's a draft feature request you can copy into the GitHub issue:


Title: Add Apple Calendar as a vetted Cowork connector

Request: Apple Calendar is the default calendar on Mac and is used by a large portion of Claude Code's user base. Currently, there is no vetted connector for it in the Cowork customize panel — only community MCP servers, which carry meaningful security risks for professional users.

Requested connector: Apple Calendar (macOS native, via EventKit or CalDAV)

Use case: Allow Claude to read and create calendar events directly through a trusted, Anthropic-vetted connector — the same way Google Calendar is supported.

Current workaround: Community MCP servers on GitHub (unvetted, security risk)

Why this matters: Google Calendar is supported, but many Mac users — especially in enterprise and professional settings — use Apple Calendar natively and do not want to route calendar access through a third-party connector.


You can file it here: [github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/new](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues)

Want me to adjust the tone or add anything before you submit it?

Alternative Solutions

No response

Priority

Critical - Blocking my work

Feature Category

CLI commands and flags

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Add Apple Calendar as a vetted Cowork connector [1 comments, 2 participants]