openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature]: Add a blocking pre-execution hook to prevent unsafe model/tool actions [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#58672Fetched 2026-04-08 01:59:27
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×1renamed ×1

Introduce a hook that runs right before a model or tool executes, enabling final validation and the ability to block harmful actions.

Root Cause

Introduce a hook that runs right before a model or tool executes, enabling final validation and the ability to block harmful actions.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

Introduce a hook that runs right before a model or tool executes, enabling final validation and the ability to block harmful actions.

Problem to solve

OpenClaw lacks a critical safety checkpoint: the capability to stop a dangerous action at the last responsible moment.

Currently, before_tool_call triggers too early—before we know the tool’s final inputs—making meaningful risk assessment nearly impossible. after_tool_call, on the other hand, is observation-only and executes once it’s too late to intervene. That’s fine for auditing, but useless for preventing damage.

For real-world scenarios—agents touching file systems, hitting external APIs, running shell commands—this gap is alarming. In sensitive environments or when dealing with untrusted inputs, we need a synchronous (or asynchronous) blocking hook with full context right before execution.

Proposed solution

A pre_execution or validate_action hook—able to inspect resolved arguments and issue a definitive go/no-go—would close this safety gap. It wouldn’t replace existing hooks, but it would give teams the final decision point they need.

Alternatives considered

No response

Impact

This is urgent. As automation grows more powerful, the cost of a single misfire skyrockets. Without a final validation layer that can say “stop” once all parameters are known, we’re effectively running without brakes.

Evidence/examples

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a pre_execution or validate_action hook to enable final validation and blocking of harmful actions before tool execution.

Guidance

  • Introduce a new hook that runs immediately before tool execution, allowing for inspection of resolved arguments and a definitive go/no-go decision.
  • This hook should have access to the final inputs and parameters of the tool, enabling meaningful risk assessment and prevention of potential damage.
  • The existing before_tool_call and after_tool_call hooks are insufficient for this purpose, as they either trigger too early or are observation-only.
  • The new hook should be designed to be synchronous or asynchronous, depending on the specific requirements of the use case.

Example

def pre_execution_hook(tool, args):
    # Inspect resolved arguments and perform risk assessment
    if is_harmful(tool, args):
        # Block the action and prevent execution
        return False
    return True

Notes

The exact implementation details of the pre_execution hook will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of the OpenClaw system. However, the key idea is to provide a final validation layer that can inspect the resolved arguments and prevent harmful actions from being executed.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by implementing a custom pre_execution hook, as the existing hooks are insufficient for preventing harmful actions. This will provide a temporary solution until a more permanent fix can be implemented.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING