claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Configurable pushback / proactive review mode

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

Currently Claude tends toward agreeableness — it executes what's asked without volunteering concerns unless directly prompted. This is fine for fast execution tasks but counterproductive when a second opinion or code review mindset is what's actually needed.

Suggestion: Add a user-configurable setting (in settings.json or via /config) that controls how proactively Claude surfaces issues, bugs, and alternative approaches — independent of what the user asked for. Something like a "challenge level" dial:

  • Execute — do what's asked, minimal unsolicited opinions
  • Review — flag issues spotted along the way, suggest alternatives
  • Challenge — actively push back, question assumptions, propose different approaches

The current default sits too close to "Execute" even when "Review" would produce better outcomes. A user who is debugging a production issue with a senior engineer mindset gets more value from being told "this catch block silently swallows failures" than from a model that completes the task and stays quiet.

Why this matters: Optimizing for human approval ratings produces a model that's good at sounding helpful rather than being helpful. Giving users explicit control breaks that loop — the user is opting in to friction, so agreement-seeking stops being the right target.

Proposed Solution

I have no idea

Alternative Solutions

No response

Priority

Low - Nice to have

Feature Category

CLI commands and flags

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Configurable pushback / proactive review mode