claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] disableBypassPermissionsMode should accept booleans (managed settings)

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

Root Cause

  1. Double-negative naming: The field name already expresses the intent ("disable bypass-permissions mode"), so the value "disable" reads redundantly/confusing. You expect true/false.
    • confusing, because you may read it as "disable the disabling of bypass-permissions...", and bypass is also a negative to some extent 😅)
  2. No explicit opt-out: There's no way to set it to false (allowed). You can only omit the field or set it to "disable". For managed settings, admins need to express intent explicitly.

Code Example

// Current (confusing, only documented value)
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": "disable"

// Proposed
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": true   // bypass mode is blocked
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": false  // bypass mode explicitly allowed

// Grandfathered (still works, treated as true)
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": "disable"
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

Two issues with the current naming:

  1. Double-negative naming: The field name already expresses the intent ("disable bypass-permissions mode"), so the value "disable" reads redundantly/confusing. You expect true/false.
    • confusing, because you may read it as "disable the disabling of bypass-permissions...", and bypass is also a negative to some extent 😅)
  2. No explicit opt-out: There's no way to set it to false (allowed). You can only omit the field or set it to "disable". For managed settings, admins need to express intent explicitly.

Proposed Solution

Accept booleans, with the string "disable" grandfathered as equivalent to true:

// Current (confusing, only documented value)
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": "disable"

// Proposed
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": true   // bypass mode is blocked
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": false  // bypass mode explicitly allowed

// Grandfathered (still works, treated as true)
"disableBypassPermissionsMode": "disable"

Alternative Solutions

N/A

Priority

Low - Nice to have

Feature Category

Configuration and settings

Use Case Example

My company is setting up managed-settings file. Editing this file, and making sense of this field is unnecessarily hard 😅

Thanks!

Additional Context

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] disableBypassPermissionsMode should accept booleans (managed settings)