claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Eu gasto 600 dólares por mês com o Claude Code e não gostei desse design novo. Time que está ganhando não se mexe. O design anterior funcionava bem — considerem reverter ou pelo menos oferecer a opção de usar o layout clássico. [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#48833Fetched 2026-04-16 06:49:40
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
2
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

Eu gasto 600 dólares por mês com o Claude Code e não gostei desse design novo. Time que está ganhando não se mexe. O design anterior funcionava bem — considerem reverter ou pelo menos oferecer a opção de usar o layout clássico.

Proposed Solution

Eu gasto 600 dólares por mês com o Claude Code e não gostei desse design novo. Time que está ganhando não se mexe. O design anterior funcionava bem — considerem reverter ou pelo menos oferecer a opção de usar o layout clássico.

Alternative Solutions

Eu gasto 600 dólares por mês com o Claude Code e não gostei desse design novo. Time que está ganhando não se mexe. O design anterior funcionava bem — considerem reverter ou pelo menos oferecer a opção de usar o layout clássico.

Priority

Critical - Blocking my work

Feature Category

CLI commands and flags

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

The user is requesting a reversion or option to use the classic layout due to dissatisfaction with the new design, which is blocking their work.

Guidance

  • The user's primary concern is the new design, so the development team should consider reverting to the classic layout or providing an option to switch between layouts.
  • To address the user's issue, the team could gather more feedback from other users to determine if others are experiencing similar difficulties with the new design.
  • The team may want to prioritize this feature request due to its "Critical - Blocking my work" priority and the user's significant monthly investment in the product.
  • The development team should consider adding a flag or configuration option to allow users to choose between the new and classic layouts.

Notes

The issue lacks technical details, and there is no clear indication of what changes were made to the design or how they are impacting the user's workflow.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Provide an option to use the classic layout, as this would allow the user to continue working without interruption while the development team gathers more feedback and considers further design changes.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING