openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature]:智能模型路由(Intelligent Model Routing) [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#52223Fetched 2026-04-08 01:14:01
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Participants
Timeline (top)
commented ×1labeled ×1renamed ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

功能描述

建议增加智能模型路由功能,根据任务类型、上下文长度、复杂度、时间等因素,自动选择最合适的模型(本地模型 vs API 模型)。

Problem to solve

当前问题

OpenClaw 当前只支持 primary + fallbacks 路由,不能根据任务类型、上下文长度等因素智能选择模型。

Proposed solution

功能描述

建议增加智能模型路由功能,根据任务类型、上下文长度、复杂度、时间等因素,自动选择最合适的模型(本地模型 vs API 模型)。

Alternatives considered

No response

Impact

预期效果

  • 节省 30% API 成本
  • 提升 3-5 倍响应速度
  • 更好的隐私保护
  • 更高的可用性

Evidence/examples

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

Fix Plan

To implement the intelligent model routing feature, we will introduce a routing mechanism that considers task type, context length, complexity, and time to select the most suitable model.

Step-by-Step Solution:

  1. Define a routing strategy: Create a function that takes task type, context length, complexity, and time as inputs and returns the preferred model (local or API).
  2. Implement model selection logic: Use a decision tree or a simple if-else statement to determine the best model based on the input factors.
  3. Integrate with existing routing: Modify the existing primary + fallbacks routing to incorporate the new intelligent routing mechanism.

Example Code (Python):

def select_model(task_type, context_length, complexity, time):
    if task_type == "simple" and context_length < 100:
        return "local_model"
    elif complexity > 0.5 and time < 1000:
        return "api_model"
    else:
        return "fallback_model"

def route_request(task_type, context_length, complexity, time):
    preferred_model = select_model(task_type, context_length, complexity, time)
    if preferred_model == "local_model":
        # Use local model
        return local_model_response
    elif preferred_model == "api_model":
        # Use API model
        return api_model_response
    else:
        # Use fallback model
        return fallback_model_response

Verification

To verify the fix, test the routing mechanism with different input scenarios and ensure that the correct model is selected. Monitor API costs, response times, and privacy protection to confirm the expected benefits.

Extra Tips

  • Continuously monitor and update the routing strategy to adapt to changing task types and model performance.
  • Consider using machine learning algorithms to optimize the routing decision-making process.
  • Ensure proper error handling and fallback mechanisms to maintain high availability.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING