claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature Request] Expose session.effort_level in statusline payload [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#49543Fetched 2026-04-17 08:38:10
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description expose session.effort_level in the statusline payload.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: cursor
  • Version: 2.1.112
  • Feedback ID: 7c1b477c-4388-4282-9bf1-d64f6d21ca82

extent analysis

TL;DR

Exposing session.effort_level in the statusline payload likely requires a code change to include this field in the payload construction.

Guidance

  • Review the code responsible for constructing the statusline payload to identify where session.effort_level can be added.
  • Verify that session.effort_level is indeed a valid property of the session object and is populated with the expected data.
  • Check the documentation or existing code for any existing mechanisms to customize or extend the statusline payload.
  • Consider testing the change in a non-production environment to ensure the addition of session.effort_level does not introduce any unintended side effects.

Notes

The exact steps to expose session.effort_level may depend on the specific implementation details of the statusline payload construction, which are not provided in the issue.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Modify the code to include session.effort_level in the statusline payload, as this seems to be a customization or extension of existing functionality rather than a bug that would be fixed in a later version.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING