openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Feature Request: Tenacity — Goal Completion Without Intermediary Confirmation Handoffs [2 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#81545Fetched 2026-05-14 03:31:01
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
2
Author
Timeline (top)
commented ×2closed ×1

Root Cause

  • Long-running tasks (data processing, multi-file refactors, research compilations) are currently fragile — a timeout in the middle means starting over
  • Hermes has this and it is cited as the #1 reason power users prefer it for autonomous coding
  • It would complement, not replace, the current turn-based model — users who want safety can keep it, users who want autonomy can enable Tenacity
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Problem

Hermes Agent (Nous Research) implements a "Tenacity" feature that keeps the agent running continuously until a goal is reached, without stopping to ask for confirmation at each step. The agent only asks for human input when it genuinely cannot proceed (blocked, needs a decision, or needs information).

OpenClaw is gateway-first and turn-based — it operates in discrete confirmation cycles. This is great for safety and control, but limits autonomous execution on long-running tasks where the path is clear.

What I am proposing

Add an optional Tenacity execution mode to OpenClaw that:

  1. Goal-oriented loop — Agent keeps executing until the stated goal is reached, or until it hits a hard blocker that genuinely requires human input
  2. Checkpoint / auto-save — If the session is interrupted (timeout, crash, reconnect), the agent resumes from the last completed step, not from scratch
  3. Heartbeat + zombie detection — If the agent loop stalls, detect it and either restart from checkpoint or alert
  4. Session auto-resume — After a disconnect, the agent picks up where it left off
  5. Kanban-style progress tracking — The agent reports progress milestones internally so the human can see where it is in the flow

Why this matters

  • Long-running tasks (data processing, multi-file refactors, research compilations) are currently fragile — a timeout in the middle means starting over
  • Hermes has this and it is cited as the #1 reason power users prefer it for autonomous coding
  • It would complement, not replace, the current turn-based model — users who want safety can keep it, users who want autonomy can enable Tenacity

References

  • Hermes Agent v0.13 "Tenacity" feature: https://blakecrosley.com/guides/hermes
  • Closed learning loop concept: Hermes stores durable identity + persistent memory on disk, aggregates skills that improve with use
  • Session auto-resume + Checkpoints v2 are part of the same feature set

Implementation suggestion

This could be implemented as:

  1. A new session mode / flag (openclaw run --tenacity)
  2. A new plugin type that wraps the agent loop with checkpoint logic
  3. A skill that instructs the agent to behave more autonomously when explicitly tasked with a long-running goal

Happy to help test or prototype if the team is interested.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix Feature Request: Tenacity — Goal Completion Without Intermediary Confirmation Handoffs [2 comments, 2 participants]