claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] Stash should work as stack, not only single slot [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#50758Fetched 2026-04-20 12:13:51
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
3
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×2commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

I often keep a stashed prompt for later using ctrl-s, great feature. However it happens that before using it again, I want to save another prompt.

Proposed Solution

It would be very useful if this would not overwrite a previous stashed prompt, which can happen accidentally and looses input but it would also be useful as a feature. Instead, it would be great if this was stacked, similar to how stashes work in git. When ctrl-s is issued and there is a pending prompt, add it as a new item on top of the stack. If the input is empty, pop from the stack, basically the same interface it has now without overwriting.

Alternative Solutions

Prevent overwriting the stashed prompt when using ctrl-s again and something is already in the single stash in order to prevent loosing the prompt accidentally. Claude code would then reject stashing with a message and keep the current prompt as is

Priority

Medium - Would be very helpful

Feature Category

Interactive mode (TUI)

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Implement a stack-based system for stashed prompts to prevent overwriting and allow multiple prompts to be saved.

Guidance

  • Consider modifying the current implementation to use a stack data structure to store stashed prompts, allowing multiple prompts to be saved and retrieved in a last-in-first-out (LIFO) order.
  • When the user attempts to stash a new prompt using ctrl-s, check if a prompt is already stashed and add the new prompt to the top of the stack if so.
  • If the input is empty when the user attempts to stash a prompt, pop the top prompt from the stack and use it instead of overwriting any existing stashed prompt.
  • To prevent accidental overwriting, consider displaying a message to the user when they attempt to stash a new prompt while one is already stashed, and provide an option to cancel the stash operation.

Example

class PromptStack:
    def __init__(self):
        self.prompts = []

    def push(self, prompt):
        self.prompts.append(prompt)

    def pop(self):
        if self.prompts:
            return self.prompts.pop()
        return None

# Usage
prompt_stack = PromptStack()

def stash_prompt(prompt):
    if prompt_stack.prompts:
        prompt_stack.push(prompt)
    else:
        prompt_stack.prompts = [prompt]

def retrieve_prompt():
    return prompt_stack.pop()

Notes

The proposed solution assumes that the current implementation uses a single variable or data structure to store the stashed prompt. The stack-based approach would require modifications to the existing code to accommodate multiple stashed prompts.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Implement a stack-based system for stashed prompts to prevent overwriting and allow multiple prompts to be saved. This approach provides a clear and intuitive way to manage multiple stashed prompts and prevents accidental overwriting.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING