openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature]: Support MESSAGE_UPDATE for new @mention detection [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
openclaw/openclaw#48894Fetched 2026-04-08 00:51:22
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
4
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
commented ×1labeled ×1mentioned ×1subscribed ×1

When a Discord message is posted without an @mention and then edited to add one, the mentioned agent is never triggered. OpenClaw only processes MESSAGE_CREATE events — MESSAGE_UPDATE with newly added @mentions is silently ignored.

Expected behaviour: If a user edits a message to add a bot @mention that wasn't in the original, OpenClaw should detect the new mention and trigger the agent session, same as if a new message were posted.

Workaround: Post a new message with the @mention instead of editing.

Context: In a multi-agent Discord workspace with requireMention: true and allowBots: true, this causes pipeline stalls when a user/agent forgets to @mention on the original message and edits to add it — the agent never responds and the user has to realise why.

OpenClaw 2026.3.13

Root Cause

When a Discord message is posted without an @mention and then edited to add one, the mentioned agent is never triggered. OpenClaw only processes MESSAGE_CREATE events — MESSAGE_UPDATE with newly added @mentions is silently ignored.

Expected behaviour: If a user edits a message to add a bot @mention that wasn't in the original, OpenClaw should detect the new mention and trigger the agent session, same as if a new message were posted.

Workaround: Post a new message with the @mention instead of editing.

Context: In a multi-agent Discord workspace with requireMention: true and allowBots: true, this causes pipeline stalls when a user/agent forgets to @mention on the original message and edits to add it — the agent never responds and the user has to realise why.

OpenClaw 2026.3.13

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

Workaround: Post a new message with the @mention instead of editing.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

When a Discord message is posted without an @mention and then edited to add one, the mentioned agent is never triggered. OpenClaw only processes MESSAGE_CREATE events — MESSAGE_UPDATE with newly added @mentions is silently ignored.

Expected behaviour: If a user edits a message to add a bot @mention that wasn't in the original, OpenClaw should detect the new mention and trigger the agent session, same as if a new message were posted.

Workaround: Post a new message with the @mention instead of editing.

Context: In a multi-agent Discord workspace with requireMention: true and allowBots: true, this causes pipeline stalls when a user/agent forgets to @mention on the original message and edits to add it — the agent never responds and the user has to realise why.

OpenClaw 2026.3.13

Problem to solve

Prevents pipeline pausing if the @mention is only added on edit message rather than create. I have improved gaurdrails and discipline with agents to prevent the issue locally however it feels as if this should be fixed to work alongside Discord native edit message function where @mentions can be added after new.

Proposed solution

OpenClaw should detect the new mention and trigger the agent session, same as if a new message were posted.

Alternatives considered

No response

Impact

Minor, just annoying.

Evidence/examples

No response

Additional information

No response

extent analysis

Fix Plan

To fix the issue, we need to modify OpenClaw to process MESSAGE_UPDATE events and trigger the agent session when a new @mention is added. Here are the steps:

  • Update the event listener to include MESSAGE_UPDATE events
  • Check if the updated message contains a new @mention that was not present in the original message
  • If a new @mention is found, trigger the agent session

Example Code

import discord

# Update the event listener to include MESSAGE_UPDATE events
@client.event
async def on_message_update(before, after):
    # Check if the updated message contains a new @mention
    new_mentions = [mention for mention in after.mentions if mention not in before.mentions]
    if new_mentions:
        # Trigger the agent session
        await trigger_agent_session(after)

# Trigger the agent session
async def trigger_agent_session(message):
    # Get the agent associated with the @mention
    agent = get_agent(message.mentions[0])
    # Trigger the agent session
    await agent.trigger_session(message)

Verification

To verify that the fix worked, test the following scenarios:

  • Edit a message to add a new @mention and verify that the agent session is triggered
  • Edit a message to remove an @mention and verify that the agent session is not triggered
  • Edit a message to add multiple new @mentions and verify that the agent sessions are triggered correctly

Extra Tips

  • Make sure to update the event listener to include MESSAGE_UPDATE events and handle the new @mention detection logic correctly.
  • Test the fix thoroughly to ensure that it works as expected in different scenarios.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature]: Support MESSAGE_UPDATE for new @mention detection [1 comments, 2 participants]