openclaw - 💡(How to fix) Fix [Feature]: Support native callback endpoints for external script integration

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…

I would like to request a native "Callback Endpoint" feature in the OpenClaw runtime.

Error Message

I am currently running Python scripts inside the same container as the OpenClaw runtime. My goal is to have these scripts notify the OpenClaw agent immediately upon completion or failure (e.g., a data fetching script fails and needs the agent to analyze the error). 1.High Latency: Relying on cron-based file polling introduces unavoidable delays (e.g., 1-minute intervals), making real-time error handling impossible.

Root Cause

I would like to request a native "Callback Endpoint" feature in the OpenClaw runtime.

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

I am currently running Python scripts inside the same container as the OpenClaw runtime. My goal is to have these scripts notify the OpenClaw agent immediately upon completion or failure (e.g., a data fetching script fails and needs the agent to analyze the error). Currently, OpenClaw does not natively expose a local callback endpoint (like a simple HTTP POST listener) for external scripts to push notifications. The existing workarounds involve: 1.Using a cron job to poll a file directory (which introduces latency and unnecessary resource consumption). 2.Running a separate, self-managed lightweight HTTP server just to bridge the communication, which adds complexity to the container's process management.

Affected users/systems/channels: Developers and automation engineers running OpenClaw in containerized environments (e.g., Docker) who need to integrate external Python scripts or CLI tools with the agent. Severity: Blocks efficient workflow. While workarounds exist, they force developers to implement fragile, non-standard architectural patterns (like file-based IPC or custom middleware) instead of using a robust, built-in integration method. Frequency: Always. Every time an external script needs to report a status (especially failures or urgent events) back to the agent, this limitation is encountered. Consequence: 1.High Latency: Relying on cron-based file polling introduces unavoidable delays (e.g., 1-minute intervals), making real-time error handling impossible. 2.Resource Waste: Continuous polling consumes unnecessary CPU cycles and I/O resources even when no events occur. 3.Increased Complexity: Developers are forced to maintain separate, self-managed HTTP servers or complex file-locking mechanisms just to 4.bridge simple communications, increasing the risk of bugs and maintenance overhead.

RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Summary

I would like to request a native "Callback Endpoint" feature in the OpenClaw runtime.

Problem to solve

 I am currently running Python scripts inside the same container as the OpenClaw runtime. My goal is to have these scripts notify the OpenClaw agent immediately upon completion or failure (e.g., a data fetching script fails and needs the agent to analyze the error).

Currently, OpenClaw does not natively expose a local callback endpoint (like a simple HTTP POST listener) for external scripts to push notifications. The existing workarounds involve: 1.Using a cron job to poll a file directory (which introduces latency and unnecessary resource consumption). 2.Running a separate, self-managed lightweight HTTP server just to bridge the communication, which adds complexity to the container's process management.

Proposed solution

I would like to request a native "Callback Endpoint" feature in the OpenClaw runtime.
Ideally, the runtime could expose a lightweight internal HTTP endpoint (e.g., POST /_internal/callback on localhost) that accepts JSON payloads. When the runtime receives a request, it should convert it into an agent message or trigger a specific event.

Alternatives considered

No response

Impact

Affected users/systems/channels:
Developers and automation engineers running OpenClaw in containerized environments (e.g., Docker) who need to integrate external Python scripts or CLI tools with the agent.
Severity:
Blocks efficient workflow. While workarounds exist, they force developers to implement fragile, non-standard architectural patterns (like file-based IPC or custom middleware) instead of using a robust, built-in integration method.
Frequency:
Always. Every time an external script needs to report a status (especially failures or urgent events) back to the agent, this limitation is encountered.
Consequence:
    1.High Latency: Relying on cron-based file polling introduces unavoidable delays (e.g., 1-minute intervals), making real-time error handling impossible.
    2.Resource Waste: Continuous polling consumes unnecessary CPU cycles and I/O resources even when no events occur.
    3.Increased Complexity: Developers are forced to maintain separate, self-managed HTTP servers or complex file-locking mechanisms just to 
    4.bridge simple communications, increasing the risk of bugs and maintenance overhead.

Evidence/examples

No response

Additional information

No response

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING