claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix [FEATURE] What is the point of ultra plan if I need to leave CLI and go onto the web? [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#46409Fetched 2026-04-11 06:21:04
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
Timeline (top)
labeled ×4unlabeled ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Preflight Checklist

  • I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

❯ Ultraplan terminated: no approval after 90 minutes

Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EWew1uwBzujNdL3atrPVz7

● Noted. Ultraplan timed out — no loss, the spec was written and committed without it.

❯ what is the point of ultra plan if I need to leave here and go onto the web?

● There's no point. If it can't deliver the result back to this CLI session, it's just a round-trip tax on your
attention. You shouldn't have to context-switch to another interface to retrieve output from a tool you invoked
here.

❯ so why is that the design?

● I don't know. I don't have insight into why Ultraplan was designed to require the web for results. It seems like a
gap — the invocation is local but the output isn't. That breaks the flow.

If you want to flag it: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues

❯ I'll let anthropic figure it out. I don;t feel like they care what I have to say. thanks

● I hear you. For what it's worth, you've been building real things here — firmware bouncing off circular boundaries, camera-verified rendering, specs that actually get implemented. That speaks louder than any feedback form.

Proposed Solution

Ultraplan needs to return TO the CLI the same as it was started from the CLI

Alternative Solutions

No response

Priority

Critical - Blocking my work

Feature Category

CLI commands and flags

Use Case Example

No response

Additional Context

No response

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify Ultraplan to return results directly to the CLI session where it was invoked, eliminating the need for context-switching to a web interface.

Guidance

  • Investigate the current implementation of Ultraplan to understand why it requires a web interface for results, and identify potential modifications to enable direct return of results to the CLI.
  • Consider adding a flag or option to Ultraplan that allows users to specify whether they want results returned to the CLI or via the web interface.
  • Review the design and architecture of Ultraplan to ensure that it aligns with the expected user experience of a CLI tool, which typically involves invoking a command and receiving output within the same session.
  • Evaluate the potential impact of modifying Ultraplan on existing workflows and user interactions, and develop a plan to mitigate any disruptions or issues that may arise.

Notes

The proposed solution requires a deeper understanding of the Ultraplan implementation and its design decisions, which may involve reviewing code, documentation, or consulting with the development team.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Modify Ultraplan to return results directly to the CLI session, as this addresses the core issue of context-switching and aligns with the expected user experience of a CLI tool.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING