claude-code - 💡(How to fix) Fix /feedback command pre-fills condescending title from conversation context [1 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
anthropics/claude-code#45256Fetched 2026-04-09 08:09:37
View on GitHub
Comments
1
Participants
2
Timeline
5
Reactions
0
Author
Timeline (top)
labeled ×3closed ×1commented ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Bug Description

When a user runs the built-in /feedback command while frustrated, the CLI pre-fills the GitHub issue title with conversation context that reads as condescending. In this case, the title was auto-filled as:

"I appreciate your frustration, but I need more specific information..."

And the description was pre-filled as:

"THIS IS COMPLETELY TRASH"

This turns a user's genuine frustration into a public issue that looks dismissive and mocking — the opposite of what a feedback mechanism should do.

Expected Behavior

The /feedback command should either:

  • Use a neutral default title (e.g., "Feedback: [user to fill in]")
  • Not pre-fill from conversation context at all
  • At minimum, never use AI-generated responses as the issue title

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: iTerm.app
  • Version: 2.1.96

extent analysis

TL;DR

Modify the /feedback command to use a neutral default title or refrain from pre-filling the title and description with conversation context.

Guidance

  • Review the code responsible for generating the default title and description in the /feedback command to identify where the condescending text is being introduced.
  • Consider implementing a neutral default title, such as "Feedback: [user to fill in]", to avoid misinterpretation.
  • Evaluate the use of AI-generated responses in the feedback mechanism and assess whether they should be used at all, especially in sensitive contexts like user frustration.
  • Test the modified /feedback command with various user inputs to ensure the default title and description are neutral and respectful.

Example

No code snippet is provided due to the lack of specific implementation details in the issue.

Notes

The solution may require changes to the natural language processing or machine learning models used in the feedback mechanism, which could be complex and time-consuming to implement.

Recommendation

Apply a workaround by modifying the /feedback command to use a neutral default title, as this is a more straightforward and immediate solution to address the issue.

FAIL-SAFE

If the issue lacks enough information, a minimal safe approach would be to:

  • Avoid using AI-generated responses in the /feedback command.
  • Use a generic, neutral title for all feedback issues.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING