dify - 💡(How to fix) Fix Follow up Security Issue [2 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
langgenius/dify#35698Fetched 2026-04-30 06:45:27
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
2
Timeline
7
Reactions
2
Timeline (top)
commented ×2closed ×1labeled ×1mentioned ×1
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • This is only for bug report, if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交,否则会被关闭 :)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Dify version

N/A

Cloud or Self Hosted

Self Hosted (Source)

Steps to reproduce

N/A

✔️ Expected Behavior

Hi maintainers,

I’m opening this public issue only to follow up on two private security reports I submitted through GitHub Security Advisories on March 30.

I haven’t received any response yet, so I wanted to kindly confirm whether the reports were received and whether they are currently being reviewed. I’m happy to provide additional information, testing notes, or PoC clarification in the private advisory threads.

For safety, I’m not including any technical vulnerability details in this public issue.

If GitHub Security Advisories is not the preferred reporting channel for this project, please let me know the correct security contact.

Thank you.

❌ Actual Behavior

N/A

extent analysis

TL;DR

The reporter should wait for a response from the maintainers or seek an alternative security contact channel.

Guidance

  • The reporter has already submitted private security reports through GitHub Security Advisories, so the next step is to wait for a response from the maintainers.
  • If no response is received, the reporter may want to try contacting the maintainers directly or seeking an alternative security contact channel.
  • The reporter should not share technical vulnerability details in public issues for safety reasons.
  • The maintainers should review the private security reports and respond to the reporter with an update on the status of the reports.

Notes

The issue lacks technical details, so it's not possible to provide a specific fix or workaround. The reporter has followed the correct procedure for submitting security reports, and now it's up to the maintainers to respond and address the issues.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Wait for a response from the maintainers or seek an alternative security contact channel, as the reporter has already submitted the security reports through the correct channel.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

dify - 💡(How to fix) Fix Follow up Security Issue [2 comments, 2 participants]