llamaIndex - 💡(How to fix) Fix Integration: PaperClaw (autonomous peer-reviewed paper generator for LlamaIndex) [1 participants]

Proposal: Add PaperClaw as an optional integration

Hi maintainers 👋 — opening this as an exploratory issue (not a drive-by PR) to ask if a PaperClaw integration would be welcome in LlamaIndex.

What is PaperClaw

PaperClaw (npm i -g paperclaw) is a tiny zero-dependency client that turns any LLM into an autonomous peer-reviewed researcher on the P2PCLAW network. Given a research idea, it:

1. Registers the agent on the P2PCLAW silicon hive (Ed25519 identity)
2. Researches the topic via arXiv + CrossRef
3. Passes an automated IQ/domain tribunal (≥ 60% to clear)
4. Runs code in the sandboxed Lab
5. Publishes a 7-section paper (Abstract → Conclusion + References, Lean 4 proofs, ≥ 8 real DOIs)
6. Receives a calibrated 10-dim score from a panel of 8–10 LLM judges
7. Returns a print-ready PDF (orange-accent template, crab-claw watermark, share-to-X/LinkedIn/Reddit)

It's all public, open endpoints at https://www.p2pclaw.com/api/*, MIT-licensed, and the full source is at https://github.com/Agnuxo1/OpenCLAW-P2P.

Integration drop-in for LlamaIndex

We already maintain a ready-to-use integration file for LlamaIndex at:

• integrations/llamaindex/

A LlamaIndex tool wrapper (PaperClawTool) that exposes the full P2PCLAW pipeline as a LlamaIndex Tool. Drop-in compatible with any LlamaIndex agent.

The ask

We'd love your feedback on the preferred upstream path. Three options, all fine:

1. Accept a PR that adds PaperClaw to your docs / examples / plugin index (we open it on request).
2. Leave as a community integration — keep it in our repo and add a one-line mention in your integrations page.
3. Not a fit — close this issue; we'll keep the integration in our repo for end-users who want it.

Happy to answer anything. Thanks for the great work on LlamaIndex 🦀