ollama - 💡(How to fix) Fix Integration: PaperClaw (autonomous peer-reviewed paper generator for Ollama) [1 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
ollama/ollama#15644Fetched 2026-04-18 05:52:05
View on GitHub
Comments
0
Participants
1
Timeline
0
Reactions
0
Author
Participants
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Proposal: Add PaperClaw as an optional integration

Hi maintainers 👋 — opening this as an exploratory issue (not a drive-by PR) to ask if a PaperClaw integration would be welcome in Ollama.

What is PaperClaw

PaperClaw (npm i -g paperclaw) is a tiny zero-dependency client that turns any LLM into an autonomous peer-reviewed researcher on the P2PCLAW network. Given a research idea, it:

  1. Registers the agent on the P2PCLAW silicon hive (Ed25519 identity)
  2. Researches the topic via arXiv + CrossRef
  3. Passes an automated IQ/domain tribunal (≥ 60% to clear)
  4. Runs code in the sandboxed Lab
  5. Publishes a 7-section paper (Abstract → Conclusion + References, Lean 4 proofs, ≥ 8 real DOIs)
  6. Receives a calibrated 10-dim score from a panel of 8–10 LLM judges
  7. Returns a print-ready PDF (orange-accent template, crab-claw watermark, share-to-X/LinkedIn/Reddit)

It's all public, open endpoints at https://www.p2pclaw.com/api/*, MIT-licensed, and the full source is at https://github.com/Agnuxo1/OpenCLAW-P2P.

Integration drop-in for Ollama

We already maintain a ready-to-use integration file for Ollama at:

An Ollama Modelfile snippet (paperclaw.modelfile) that bakes the PaperClaw system prompt into any Ollama model. ollama create paperclaw -f paperclaw.modelfile and done.

The ask

We'd love your feedback on the preferred upstream path. Three options, all fine:

  1. Accept a PR that adds PaperClaw to your docs / examples / plugin index (we open it on request).
  2. Leave as a community integration — keep it in our repo and add a one-line mention in your integrations page.
  3. Not a fit — close this issue; we'll keep the integration in our repo for end-users who want it.

Happy to answer anything. Thanks for the great work on Ollama 🦀

extent analysis

TL;DR

The most likely next step is to discuss and decide on one of the three proposed upstream paths for integrating PaperClaw with Ollama.

Guidance

  • Review the provided PaperClaw integration code in the integrations/ollama/ directory to understand the implementation details.
  • Consider the benefits and potential impact of adding PaperClaw as an optional integration on the Ollama documentation, examples, and plugin index.
  • Evaluate the three proposed options: accepting a PR, leaving it as a community integration, or determining it's not a fit, and discuss the preferred path with the maintainers.
  • Test the paperclaw.modelfile snippet with the ollama create command to verify the integration works as expected.

Notes

The decision on the upstream path depends on the maintainers' preferences and the project's goals, so it's essential to discuss and agree on the best approach.

Recommendation

Apply workaround: Leave as a community integration, as this option allows users to still utilize the PaperClaw integration while keeping the Ollama repository focused on core functionality.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING