langchain - ✅(Solved) Fix [langchain]: docs have multiple typos in comments, tests, and user-facing strings [1 pull requests, 2 comments, 2 participants]

Official PRs (…)
ON THIS PAGE

Recommended Tools

×6

Utilities matched from this issue’s tags and category — try them while you read without losing context.

GitHub issue graph ai analysis

Paste a GitHub issue URL. We fetch that issue, discover linked issues from bodies/comments/timeline, collect linked pull requests, and produce a structured English report.

The report is written in English Markdown for sharing and archival.

Helpful · Quick feedback

Loading…
GitHub stats
langchain-ai/langchain#36458Fetched 2026-04-08 02:33:28
View on GitHub
Comments
2
Participants
2
Timeline
17
Reactions
0
Assignees
Timeline (top)
mentioned ×4subscribed ×4commented ×2labeled ×2

During a code review, I identified several minor spelling mistakes and typographical errors across the repository. These issues affect comments, test strings, and some user-facing text.

While none of these problems impact functionality, correcting them improves overall code quality, readability, and professionalism of the project.

Error Message

Error Message and Stack Trace (if applicable)

Root Cause

During a code review, I identified several minor spelling mistakes and typographical errors across the repository. These issues affect comments, test strings, and some user-facing text.

While none of these problems impact functionality, correcting them improves overall code quality, readability, and professionalism of the project.

Fix Action

Fix / Workaround

  • This is a bug, not a usage question.
  • I added a clear and descriptive title that summarizes this issue.
  • I used the GitHub search to find a similar question and didn't find it.
  • I am sure that this is a bug in LangChain rather than my code.
  • The bug is not resolved by updating to the latest stable version of LangChain (or the specific integration package).
  • This is not related to the langchain-community package.
  • I posted a self-contained, minimal, reproducible example. A maintainer can copy it and run it AS IS.

PR fix notes

PR #36459: fix(core): fixed typos in the documentation

Description (problem / solution / changelog)

Fixes #36458

Fixed typos in the documentation in the core module.

Changed files

  • libs/core/langchain_core/messages/utils.py (modified, +4/-4)
  • libs/core/langchain_core/runnables/__init__.py (modified, +1/-1)
  • libs/core/langchain_core/tools/__init__.py (modified, +1/-1)
  • libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py (modified, +2/-2)
  • libs/partners/anthropic/tests/integration_tests/test_chat_models.py (modified, +2/-2)
  • libs/partners/openai/tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_responses_api.py (modified, +4/-4)

Code Example

libs/core/langchain_core/messages/utils.py:
"whats in this" -> "what's in this"
"thats nice" -> "that's nice"

libs/core/langchain_core/runnables/__init__.py:
"suppor" -> "support"

libs/core/langchain_core/tools/__init__.py:
"righ tool" -> "right tool"

libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:
"tryig" -> "trying"
"tryig" -> "trying"

libs/partners/anthropic/tests/integration_tests/test_chat_models.py:
"compation" -> "compaction"
"compation" -> "compaction"

libs/partners/openai/tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_responses_api.py:
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"buliding" -> "building"

---

%

---

%
RAW_BUFFERClick to expand / collapse

Checked other resources

  • This is a bug, not a usage question.
  • I added a clear and descriptive title that summarizes this issue.
  • I used the GitHub search to find a similar question and didn't find it.
  • I am sure that this is a bug in LangChain rather than my code.
  • The bug is not resolved by updating to the latest stable version of LangChain (or the specific integration package).
  • This is not related to the langchain-community package.
  • I posted a self-contained, minimal, reproducible example. A maintainer can copy it and run it AS IS.

Package (Required)

  • langchain
  • langchain-openai
  • langchain-anthropic
  • langchain-classic
  • langchain-core
  • langchain-model-profiles
  • langchain-tests
  • langchain-text-splitters
  • langchain-chroma
  • langchain-deepseek
  • langchain-exa
  • langchain-fireworks
  • langchain-groq
  • langchain-huggingface
  • langchain-mistralai
  • langchain-nomic
  • langchain-ollama
  • langchain-openrouter
  • langchain-perplexity
  • langchain-qdrant
  • langchain-xai
  • Other / not sure / general

Related Issues / PRs

Type of issue

issue / bug

Language

N/A

Description

Description

During a code review, I identified several minor spelling mistakes and typographical errors across the repository. These issues affect comments, test strings, and some user-facing text.

While none of these problems impact functionality, correcting them improves overall code quality, readability, and professionalism of the project.


Scope of Changes

This is a non-functional change only:

  • No logic, variables, or behavior were modified
  • Only spelling and wording corrections were applied

Detailed Changes

libs/core/langchain_core/messages/utils.py:
"whats in this" -> "what's in this"
"thats nice" -> "that's nice"

libs/core/langchain_core/runnables/__init__.py:
"suppor" -> "support"

libs/core/langchain_core/tools/__init__.py:
"righ tool" -> "right tool"

libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:
"tryig" -> "trying"
"tryig" -> "trying"

libs/partners/anthropic/tests/integration_tests/test_chat_models.py:
"compation" -> "compaction"
"compation" -> "compaction"

libs/partners/openai/tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_responses_api.py:
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"whats 5 * 4" -> "what's 5 * 4"
"buliding" -> "building"

Motivation

Even small inconsistencies in spelling—especially in user-facing strings—can reduce perceived quality and clarity. Fixing these ensures:

  • More polished developer and user experience
  • Improved consistency across the codebase
  • Cleaner test outputs and documentation

Reproduction Steps / Example Code (Python)

%

Error Message and Stack Trace (if applicable)

%

Description

During a code review, I identified several minor spelling mistakes and typographical errors across the repository. These issues affect comments, test strings, and some user-facing text.

While none of these problems impact functionality, correcting them improves overall code quality, readability, and professionalism of the project.

System Info

x86_64

extent analysis

TL;DR

Apply the provided spelling and wording corrections to improve code quality and readability.

Guidance

  • Review the detailed changes section to identify all the necessary corrections, including "whats" to "what's", "thats" to "that's", "suppor" to "support", and others.
  • Apply these corrections to the respective files, such as libs/core/langchain_core/messages/utils.py, libs/core/langchain_core/runnables/__init__.py, and others.
  • Verify that the corrections do not introduce any functional changes by reviewing the code and running relevant tests.
  • Consider using automated tools or linters to detect similar spelling and typographical errors in the future.

Notes

The provided corrections are non-functional changes, so they should not affect the behavior of the code. However, it's still important to review and test the changes to ensure they are accurate and complete.

Recommendation

Apply the workaround by manually applying the provided corrections to improve code quality and readability, as the issue is related to minor spelling mistakes and typographical errors.

Vote matrix · Quick signals

Works
Did the solution work? Tap to confirm.
Easy Fix
Was it a quick fix?
Time Saver
Did it save you time?
Blocking
Was it severely blocking?
Common Issue
Are others likely hitting this too?
Flaky / Intermittent
Is it intermittent?
Verified / Reproducible
Can you reproduce it reliably?
Loading…

Still need to ship something?

×6

Another batch ranked right after the header list — different links, same matching logic.

Back to top recommendations

TRENDING

langchain - ✅(Solved) Fix [langchain]: docs have multiple typos in comments, tests, and user-facing strings [1 pull requests, 2 comments, 2 participants]